Retour aux appels d'offres

Reconstruction du pont Emalätte

Ouvert
Date limite
14 jours restants
Mars 17, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306563
Valeur
€121,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 27, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total bid cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 27, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 10, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 17, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 17, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 01, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€121,000
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Ce marché public entraînera la commande de la reconstruction du pont Emalätte situé sur le sentier de randonnée de Taevaskoda. Lieu des travaux : village de Taevaskoja, municipalité de Põlva, comté de Põlva, parcelle appartenant au Centre de gestion forestière de l'État, district forestier de Kiidjärve 82, code cadastral 61901:001:0124, terrain forestier à 100%. L'infrastructure/l'objet d'accueil à reconstruire figure dans le registre des bâtiments – code ER 221324222.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

15 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (5)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (4)
Technique (3)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Deadline for submission: 2026-03-17 12:00:00.
--The contracting authority has the right to change the expected contract award date.
--The contracting authority has the right to award the contract earlier than the expected date.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general procurement law applies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions using the Hankepass (preliminary evidence).
--Bidders must confirm compliance with specified conditions.
--Bidders must provide clarification on business secrets if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must have prior guided familiarization with the object (Emalätte bridge).
--Technical specifications for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge are detailed in LISA 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus_Emalätte sild.docx, including location, scope, environmental and safety requirements, and time limits.
--The contract project (Lepingu projekt.docx) defines construction work conditions and quality requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is valued at 121,000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306563_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

The contracting authority requires a prior guided site visit and confirmation of compliance with tender conditions, as well as clarification on trade secrets if applicable.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306563_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.9 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus evaluates bids for the Emalätte bridge reconstruction primarily based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306563_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

HankedokumentDOC
HD.docx -- 58.1 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge, requiring mandatory guided site visits for potential bidders.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 37.7 KB

The draft contract project defines the construction work conditions, quality requirements, and integral parts of the contract, including the contractor's bid and technical description.

Lepingu lisa 1 - tehniline kirjeldusDOC
LISA 1 - Tehniline kirjeldus_Emalätte sild.do... -- 31.8 KB

The technical specification details the location, scope, environmental and safety requirements, and time restrictions for the Emalätte bridge reconstruction works.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

The joint bidders' power of attorney and confirmation is a required document that proves the rights and obligations of joint bidder members and confirms their participation in the tender.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for the reconstruction of Emalätte bridge is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document formats.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement laws, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are indicated. The procedure type (LM) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible. The status '11' typically indicates an ongoing or active tender.

Clarté80/100

The description of the reconstruction work is clear, and the location is well-defined. Key requirements such as the mandatory site visit and the use of Hankepass are specified. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', which is a standard approach.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, some crucial documents (e.g., technical specifications, contract project) are referenced but not directly accessible or are in formats not easily analyzed by AI, impacting the completeness of the provided information for a full assessment.

Some key documents are in formats not easily analyzed by AI (e.g., .asice, .zip).
Équité85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access (though format limitations exist) and disclosed value. The criteria are objective (primarily cost). The use of e-procurement and electronic submission enhances fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract start date is specified. However, the reliance on specific file formats for key documents (.asice, .zip) might pose practical challenges for bidders if these are not standard or easily handled. The URL for opening place is provided.

Key documents are in formats not easily handled by standard AI analysis tools, potentially impacting bidder preparation.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated and consistent. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender valid period of 3 months aligns with the contract start date.

Durabilité50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of specific sustainability focus within the tender requirements.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Points forts

Clear description of work and location
Mandatory site visit requirement
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria (primarily cost)

Préoccupations

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Some key documents in non-standard or AI-unfriendly formats
Potential for contract award date changes

Recommandations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact mitigation, use of sustainable materials).
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in universally accessible and AI-analyzable formats.
3. Clarify the implications and potential frequency of contract award date changes.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline