Retour aux appels d'offres

Avant-projet de la passerelle piétonne Porijõe

Fermé
Date limite
0 jours restants
Mars 03, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
306478
Valeur
€10,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 19, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 19, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 24, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 03, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 03, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€10,000
Durée
2 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
84
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de l'appel d'offres est de commander dans un premier temps l'avant-projet du pont Porijõe, sans réaliser d'études de construction physiques.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

25 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (8)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (5)
Technique (8)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-03 09:00:00.
--Submit an electronically filled European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in the expected format.
--Submit the "Application for participation in the procurement procedure" form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Confirm compliance with qualification requirements.
--Confirm agreement with the tender conditions.
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The project involves the preliminary design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge.
--The preliminary design must specify the bridge type.
--The preliminary design must specify the bridge dimensions (gabariidid).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit a financial offer for the preliminary design project.
--The preliminary design must include cost estimates (as part of the deliverable).
--Bids will be evaluated solely on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306478_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines the compliance conditions for submitting a tender, covering power of attorney for joint bids, declaration of business secrets, subcontractor involvement, and confirmation of bid adherence to terms.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306478_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation criteria for the Porijõe light traffic bridge preliminary design tender, where bids will be assessed solely based on cost, with the lowest bid receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306478_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 40.7 KB

This ESPD is an informational document for the Porijõe pedestrian bridge preliminary design tender, outlining the conditions and expected response format for the electronically submitted ESPD, rather than being a form for direct completion.

HankedokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 27.1 KB

This document is the basic public procurement document from Kambja Rural Municipality Government for the Porijõe light traffic bridge sketch project, outlining the procurement procedure type, deadlines, and contact information.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 32.4 KB

This document is a draft service contract between Kambja Rural Municipality Government and a contractor, outlining the terms and scope for the preliminary design of the Porijõe light traffic bridge.

Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lähteülesanne ja tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 537.9 KB

This document outlines the terms of reference for the Porijõgi pedestrian bridge preliminary design, specifying requirements for bridge type, dimensions, load capacity, cost, and location.

Lisa 1 Jõeveere DP põhijoonisPDF
Lisa 1 Jõeveere DP põhijoonis.pdf -- 2.0 MB

This document is the main drawing of the Jõeveere detailed plan, providing background information and context for the design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge.

Taotlus hankemenetluses osalemiseksDOC
Taotlus hankemenetluses osalemiseks.docx -- 23.4 KB

This document is an application for participation in the procurement procedure, where the tenderer confirms their agreement with the tender conditions and compliance with the qualification requirements.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

84
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for the preliminary design of the Porijõe pedestrian bridge is well-structured and transparent, particularly regarding its clear requirements and objective evaluation criteria. While generally compliant and complete, minor inconsistencies in metadata and a lack of explicit sustainability focus are noted.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender adheres to national regulations for simplified procedures, with reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. A minor inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description is present but clarified by the detailed documents.

Minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. price-only) in high-level metadata.
Clarté90/100

The project description, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria are clearly defined and easily understandable, supported by comprehensive documentation.

Exhaustivité95/100

All essential information, including basic details, financial data, timelines, and a full set of relevant documents, is provided. The XML document not being AI-analyzed is not a critical human-readable information gap.

Équité95/100

The procurement ensures fairness through transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price), disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and enabled e-procurement. Requirements are generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique80/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date and specific financing details are not explicitly provided.

Contract start date not explicitly provided.
Specific financing details (beyond estimated value) are not available.
Cohérence des données80/100

Most data fields are consistent. A minor discrepancy exists between the high-level evaluation criteria description (relative_weighting) and the detailed document, which specifies price-only evaluation.

Inconsistency between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in basic info and 'Bids will be evaluated solely on price' in AI-extracted requirements/documents.
Durabilité20/100

The tender does not explicitly include green, social, or innovation-related sustainability criteria. This is common for small, technical service procurements but results in a low score for this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Points forts

Clear and specific technical requirements for the preliminary design.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Comprehensive documentation provided, including draft contract and technical specifications.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled, promoting accessibility.
Reasonable submission deadline for the scope and value of the project.

Préoccupations

Minor inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. price-only) in the metadata, though clarified in documents.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Absence of a specified contract start date.

Recommandations

1. Ensure consistency in all tender metadata, particularly regarding evaluation criteria, to avoid potential confusion.
2. Consider incorporating basic sustainability or social responsibility clauses, even for small procurements, where applicable.
3. Provide an estimated contract start date for better planning by potential bidders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline