Retour aux appels d'offres

Recrutement de participants pour l'enquête nationale sur la nutrition 2026

Ouvert
Date limite
10 jours restants
Mars 13, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
306423
Valeur
€120,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 20, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Cost50%
Description of work, timeline, and team45%
Inclusion of a socio-economic layer in the sample5%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 20, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 06, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 13, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 13, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Mai 15, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€120,000
Durée
13 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
80
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€40,919
Offres moyennes
1.9
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
95%
495 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du marché est le service de recrutement de participants à l'enquête nationale sur la nutrition (ENN) réalisée par le prestataire, aboutissant à 1200 participants à l'ENN.
Financement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

25 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (4)
Technique (11)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must electronically complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Bidders must confirm compliance of their bid.
--Joint bidders must provide a power of attorney using the provided form (Uhispakkuja_volikiri.docx).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must electronically complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) to prove qualification and compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must agree to the general terms and conditions of the contract (Lisa 13).
--Bidders must agree to the data processing agreement, outlining obligations and rights for personal data processing in accordance with GDPR (Lisa 7).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Proposal must include a detailed description of work execution, timeline, and activity plan (45% weight).
--Proposal must include details of the team, specifically the Project Manager's CV using the provided form, detailing education and previous experience in population-based project management (45% weight).
--Proposal must address the inclusion of a socio-economic layer in the sample (5% weight).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Proposal must include cost information (50% weight).
--Bidders must present cost information according to a specified structure.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

19 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306423_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.2 KB

This document outlines the general conditions for tender submission, including requirements for confirming tender compliance, power of attorney for joint bidders, designation of business secrets, and the structure for presenting the tender cost.

Ärisaladuse vormDOC
Lisa_12_Arisaladus.docx -- 53.6 KB

This form allows bidders to declare specific information within their tender submission as a business secret, providing justification for its confidentiality while adhering to restrictions on what cannot be marked as such.

Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_RTU2026PDF
Lisa_1_Tehniline_kirjeldus_RTU2026.pdf -- 371.8 KB

Tender document 'Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus_RTU2026' in .PDF format (380,713 bytes).

Lisa 8 – Projektijuht CVDOC
Lisa_8_Projektijuht_CV_RTU2026.docx -- 100.5 KB

This document is a CV form for a project manager, requiring information on education and previous experience in managing population-based projects to assess the bidder's team competence.

Ühispakkuja volikirja vormDOC
Uhispakkuja_volikiri.docx -- 20.8 KB

This is a power of attorney form for joint bidders, allowing one partner to authorize another to submit a tender and perform all procurement-related actions on their behalf.

VolikiriDOC
Volikiri .docx -- 25.6 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing a designated individual to represent the bidder and sign the tender submission for the public procurement.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306423_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.0 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and their weights for proposals, with 45% for the description of work, timeline, and team, 5% for adding a socioeconomic layer to the sample, and 50% for the cost.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306423_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.2 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions and requirements, which companies must complete electronically to prove their qualification and compliance with the tender terms.

Lisa 10 Turu-uuringu kokkuvõteDOC
Lisa_10_Turu-uuring_RTU2026.docx -- 35.4 KB

This document summarizes the market research conducted by the contracting authority among three potential bidders before the tender, covering submission deadlines, estimated costs, recruitment methods, and data management simplification.

Lisa 11 Pakkumuse hindamiskriteeriumidPDF
Lisa_11_Pakkumuse_hindamiskriteeriumid_RTU202... -- 72.7 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, including the relevance of the work description, the addition of a socioeconomic layer to the sample, and cost, along with point distribution and scoring scales.

Lepingu üldtingimusedPDF
Lisa_13_2025_lepingu_uldtingimused.pdf -- 64.8 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for service contracts of the National Institute for Health Development, regulating the legal relationship, obligations, and work execution requirements between the client and the contractor.

Lisa 2 Valimi jaotusXLS
Lisa_2_Valimi_jaotus_A-B-C_RTU2026.xlsx -- 19.6 KB

This document details the structure and desired number of participants for the 2026 population nutrition survey sample, broken down by region, age group, and ethnicity.

Lisa 3 Uuringu skeemPDF
Lisa_3_Uuringu_skeemRTU2026.pdf -- 95.2 KB

This document outlines the detailed scheme and workflow for the 2026 population nutrition survey, including participant recruitment, data collection methods, informed consent processes, and data management.

Lisa 4 KontaktihaldusfailXLS
Lisa_4_Kontaktihaldusfail_RTU2026.xlsx -- 22.8 KB

This document is a contact management file that the contractor will use to manage participant data and survey progress for the 2026 population nutrition survey, filling in the blue-marked columns during the work.

Lisa 5 TeavituskiriDOC
Lisa_5_Teavituskiri_RTU2026 .docx -- 29.7 KB

This document is a notification letter describing the objectives, methodology, and participation conditions of the 2026 population nutrition survey for potential respondents.

Lisa 6 nõusolekuvormPDF
Lisa_6_Nousolekuvorm_RTU2026.pdf -- 188.1 KB

This document is a sample consent form that the contracting authority expects to be used for recruiting participants in the 2026 population nutrition survey.

Lisa 7 Andmetöötluse lepingPDF
Lisa_7_Andmetootluse_leping_RTU2026_docx.pdf -- 120.0 KB

This document is a data processing agreement annex, outlining the authorized processor's obligations and rights regarding personal data processing in accordance with GDPR, forming an integral part of the procurement contract.

Lisa 9 Lepingu eritingimusedDOC
Lisa_9_Lepingu_eritingimused_RTU2026.docx -- 136.2 KB

This document outlines the special conditions of the service contract, requiring the contractor to recruit 1200 participants for the national nutrition survey, ensuring sample representativeness and documenting the recruitment process.

Riigihanke alusdokumentPDF
Riigihanke alusdokument (RHAD)_RTU2026.pdf -- 137.3 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the public procurement of recruiting participants for the 2026 national nutrition survey, including contracting authority details, estimated cost, funding, bidder eligibility, and business secret regulations.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

80
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is well-documented and transparent regarding its scope and practical aspects, benefiting from EU funding and e-procurement. However, a critical inconsistency in the evaluation criteria weighting significantly compromises its clarity and fairness.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale80/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, utilizing the ESPD and being EU-funded, which implies adherence to higher standards. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriate. A minor ambiguity exists regarding the procedure type ('A') combined with 'Negotiation Allowed', which could be clarified.

Procedure type 'A' combined with 'Negotiation Allowed' could be more explicitly defined.
Clarté45/100

While the project description and performance conditions are clear, there is a critical inconsistency in the evaluation criteria weighting. The AI-extracted requirements list weights that sum to 145%, whereas the summaries of the evaluation criteria documents (Doc 3 and 7) suggest a 100% sum. This fundamental discrepancy creates significant ambiguity for bidders and severely impacts the clarity of the tender.

Evaluation criteria weighting is inconsistent and sums to 145% in AI-extracted requirements, conflicting with document summaries (Doc 3 & 7) that imply 100%.
Exhaustivité95/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic, financial, timeline, and classification information. A comprehensive set of 20 supporting documents is referenced, detailing requirements, criteria, and contractual terms, ensuring bidders have ample information.

Équité80/100

The tender generally promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and e-procurement. However, the critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria weighting directly impacts transparency and objectivity, thus reducing the fairness score. Market research among potential bidders is noted but not deemed to lead to tailoring without further evidence.

Inconsistent evaluation criteria weighting compromises transparency and objectivity for bidders.
Aspect pratique95/100

The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission and e-procurement. Key practical details such as the contract start date, duration, and financing information are clearly provided, facilitating bidder participation and planning.

Cohérence des données100/100

All key fields are populated, and there are no detected suspensions or disputes. The dates provided for reveal, submission, opening, and contract start are logical and consistent, indicating excellent data integrity.

Durabilité50/100

While the tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. The 'socio-economic layer' is a technical requirement for the survey, not a social procurement criterion.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation with many annexes.
Clear project description and performance conditions.
Full transparency on estimated value and e-procurement.
EU funding indicates adherence to higher standards.
Logical and consistent timeline and data.

Préoccupations

Significant ambiguity in evaluation criteria weighting (AI-extracted requirements sum to 145%, while document summaries suggest 100%).
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Procedure type 'A' with 'Negotiation Allowed' could be clearer.
Market research among specific bidders, while not necessarily unfair, warrants careful monitoring for potential tailoring.

Recommandations

1. Immediately clarify and correct the evaluation criteria weighting to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Consider integrating specific green, social, or innovation criteria into future tenders, even for service procurements.
3. Explicitly state the full name of the procurement procedure (e.g., 'Open Procedure with Negotiation' if applicable) to avoid ambiguity.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline