Retour aux appels d'offres

Construction des vestiaires et des sanitaires du gymnase d'État de Tõnismäe.

Ouvert
Date limite
13 jours restants
Mars 16, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306377
Valeur
€477,100
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 16, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
TOTAL (Contract price)100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 16, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 09, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 16, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 16, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Juin 27, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€477,100
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
66
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif est de construire, en tant qu'entrepreneur principal, dans les délais et aux coûts optimaux, les vestiaires et sanitaires faisant l'objet de l'appel d'offres, ainsi que les locaux auxiliaires nécessaires, et de construire des zones coupe-feu pour le tableau électrique principal et la salle des serveurs.
Achats écologiquesSoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

1 exigences dans 1 catégories

Obligatoire (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders and their subcontractors must not be involved in criminal offenses such as fraud and money laundering.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

12 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306377_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the grounds for excluding subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses like fraud and money laundering, and requires the bidder to provide answers regarding compliance with these conditions.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306377_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 17.2 KB

This document outlines general tender submission conditions, including the adoption of contracting authority's terms, handling of business secrets, submission of Forms 2 and 3 for participation and pricing, and qualification requirements for the construction project manager.

Vorm 2DOC
Vorm 2.docx -- 19.0 KB

This form serves as a bidder's declaration confirming understanding and acceptance of tender conditions, commitment to the bid's cost and validity, and declaration of subcontractors and trade secrets.

VORM 3XLS
VORM 3.xlsx -- 29.0 KB

This document is a tender cost table where the bidder must fill in the prices for various design and construction works and related services in euros, excluding VAT.

Vorm 4DOC
Vorm 4.docx -- 17.6 KB

This form is for submitting the CVs of key specialists (project manager, site manager) required for the contract, including their name, date of birth, professional certificate number, and a confirmation of their availability.

Vorm 8DOC
Vorm 8.docx -- 13.7 KB

This form is a power of attorney used for joint bids, authorizing one partner to act on behalf of others in the procurement procedure.

Vorm 9XLS
Vorm 9.xlsx -- 1.2 MB

Bidders must complete this form to provide the furniture specifications for the Tõnismäe State Gymnasium project, filling in all white or red marked cells.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306377_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that offers will be assessed solely on price, with the lowest bid receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306377_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.9 KB

This explanatory ESPD document outlines the qualification conditions and exclusion grounds for the Tõnismäe State Gymnasium changing and washing rooms construction tender, which bidders must complete electronically.

Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Alusdokument pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.do... -- 43.4 KB

This document provides instructions for submitting a tender, outlines general procurement conditions, refers to the technical description and draft contract, and includes contact details and site visit times.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 307.7 KB

This document is the technical description for the public procurement of the construction of changing rooms and washrooms for Tõnismäe State Gymnasium, defining the scope of work, basic documents, object data, and the main contractor's obligations in preparing the work project and arranging expertise.

Lisa 2 Lepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 98.9 KB

This document is a draft construction contract for the development of changing and washing rooms at Tõnismäe State Gymnasium, outlining general and special conditions, deadlines, and penalties.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

66
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is comprehensive in its documentation and supports electronic submission, but is significantly hampered by critical inconsistencies in evaluation criteria and ambiguities regarding financial classification and contract start dates.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, providing reasonable deadlines and standard clauses like 'or equivalent'. However, the CPV code '5868' is not a standard 8-digit code, and the statement 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value, creating minor compliance ambiguities.

Non-standard CPV code (5868)
Ambiguous 'Value Classified' statement
Clarté60/100

While the project description and requirements are generally clear, a critical contradiction exists between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit statement that evaluation is 'solely on price'. The indicative nature of the contract start date also reduces clarity for bidders.

Contradictory evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. solely on price)
Indicative contract start date
Exhaustivité80/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all essential basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and a comprehensive set of 13 documents including technical specifications and a draft contract. Minor details like explicit contract duration in the basic info are not present but likely covered in documents.

Équité70/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, e-procurement, and the 'or equivalent' clause. However, the fundamental contradiction in evaluation criteria (price vs. relative weighting) severely undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot be certain how their proposals will truly be assessed.

Contradictory evaluation criteria
Ambiguous 'Value Classified' statement
Aspect pratique65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the contract start date being 'indicative and has no legal meaning' reduces the practicality for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation. The lack of explicit contract duration in the basic information also slightly impacts planning.

Indicative contract start date with no legal meaning
Contract duration not explicitly stated in basic info
Cohérence des données40/100

This category presents the most significant issues. There is a direct and critical contradiction between the stated evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting') and the detailed explanation ('solely on price'). The CPV code is non-standard, and the 'Value Classified: Yes' statement conflicts with the disclosed estimated value.

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria
Non-standard CPV code
Durabilité50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step towards sustainability. However, it lacks specific social criteria and innovation focus, and is not identified as EU-funded, which often brings higher sustainability requirements.

Lack of explicit social criteria
No innovation focus

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation provided
Supports electronic submission and e-procurement
Clear justification for not dividing into lots
Includes 'or equivalent' clause for standards
Explicitly mentions Green Procurement

Préoccupations

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (price vs. relative weighting)
Ambiguity regarding 'Value Classified' status
Non-standard CPV code used
Contract start date is indicative and lacks legal meaning
Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria

Recommandations

1. Clarify and resolve the contradiction in evaluation criteria immediately to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide a standard 8-digit CPV code for better classification and searchability.
3. Clarify the meaning of 'Value Classified: Yes' in relation to the disclosed estimated value.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline