Retour aux appels d'offres

Achat de produits d'incontinence pour le centre de santé d'Otepää

Ouvert
Date limite
2 jours restants
Mars 05, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
306037
Valeur
€115,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 17, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 17, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 26, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 05, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 05, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Mars 15, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€115,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
76
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€92,792
Offres moyennes
2.2
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
86%
3,220 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de l'appel d'offres est de conclure un accord-cadre pour l'achat de produits d'incontinence et de fournitures médicales sur la base des noms et descriptions fournis à l'annexe 1 des documents d'appel d'offres.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

10 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (4)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (1)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit the application form for participation to confirm interest (Annex 2).
--Submit the cost form (Annex 3), detailing product names, descriptions, and unit prices according to the contracting authority's list and estimated quantities.
--Adhere to the general conditions of the open procurement procedure, including specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Confirm non-existence of exclusion grounds as per Public Procurement Act (criminal background, tax debts, sanctions).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--(For joint bidders) Appoint a representative.
--(For joint bidders) Confirm joint and several liability.
--(For joint bidders) State if the submission is a joint bid.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Offered products must meet detailed technical requirements and standards for incontinence products and hospital supplies.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a competitive price, as bids will be evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306037_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document specifies the requirement for joint bidders to appoint a representative and submit a power of attorney, confirming their joint and several liability, and asks if it's a joint bid and if the power of attorney has been attached.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306037_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that bids for the Otepää Health Centre's incontinence products procurement will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306037_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.8 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide to the conditions and expected information for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the Otepää Health Centre's incontinence product procurement, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.doc -- 56.5 KB

This document details the technical requirements and standards for the incontinence products to be procured for the Otepää Health Center.

Riigihankes osalemise avaldusDOC
Lisa 2 Riigihankes osalemise avaldus.doc -- 33.0 KB

This document is an application form for participating in the tender, which the bidder must submit to confirm their intent to participate.

MaksumusvormXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumusvorm.xlsx -- 14.0 KB

This document is a pricing form where bidders must provide the names, descriptions, and unit prices of the offered incontinence products according to the contracting authority's list and estimated quantities.

HankepassDOC
Lisa 4 Hankepass.docx -- 18.1 KB

This document requires bidders to confirm they do not meet any of the exclusion criteria specified in the Public Procurement Act, such as criminal background, tax arrears, or sanctions.

RHADDOC
RHAD inko.docx -- 21.7 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for the open procurement procedure for a framework agreement for incontinence products and hospital supplies for Otepää Tervisekeskus, including submission requirements and the contract period from 15.03.2026 to 14.03.2029.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

76
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This public procurement is generally well-structured and transparent, but requires clarification regarding the evaluation criteria. The tender provides comprehensive documentation and utilizes e-procurement, enhancing accessibility.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and the submission period of 16 days is reasonable. However, a significant inconsistency exists between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic information and the 'solely on cost' criterion detailed in Document 9 and AI-extracted requirements, posing a legal compliance risk.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Clarté80/100

The description of the procurement and its requirements are generally clear and well-documented. However, the conflicting information regarding the evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Exhaustivité90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, and duration. All necessary documents are listed and summarized, ensuring bidders have access to comprehensive details.

Équité85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement ensures equal access for bidders. The evaluation criterion of 'lowest price' is objective and transparent, although the initial inconsistency with 'relative_weighting' could cause initial confusion. Requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Initial inconsistency in evaluation criteria description
Aspect pratique75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the opening place URL is provided, a direct URL to the tender documents would further enhance practicality for bidders.

No direct URL to tender documents provided in basic information
Cohérence des données60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, the direct contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' and the detailed 'evaluated solely on cost' is a significant data inconsistency that could lead to confusion and potential challenges.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Durabilité20/100

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. While common for commodity procurements, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.

Absence of green procurement criteria
Absence of social criteria

Points forts

Clear identification of goods and purpose (incontinence products and hospital supplies)
Comprehensive documentation provided, including technical specifications and required forms
Transparency in estimated value and use of e-procurement for accessibility
Clear timeline and contract duration
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price) specified in detail within documents

Préoccupations

Significant inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'solely on cost')
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation considerations
Minor ambiguity due to 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value
Absence of a direct URL to tender documents in the basic information

Recommandations

1. Clarify and ensure consistency in the stated evaluation criteria across all tender documents and characteristics to avoid ambiguity.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability or social responsibility clauses, where feasible, even for commodity procurements.
3. Provide a direct link to the tender documents for easier access and improved practicality.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline