Retour aux appels d'offres

Revêtement des rues de la ville de Tartu en 2026

Ouvert
Date limite
7 jours restants
Mars 09, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306007
Valeur
€163,934
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 09, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Offer price100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 09, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 02, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 09, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 09, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€163,934
Durée
4 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
81
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

La spécification technique est fournie dans l'annexe des documents de base. Liste des objets dans les documents de base et la spécification technique.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

17 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (6)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The ESPD must be filled out electronically.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Rules for marking business secrets must be followed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Must meet the exclusion grounds requirements specified in the ESPD.
--Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal convictions or unreliability that would lead to their exclusion during the contract performance stage.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Must meet the qualification requirements specified in the ESPD.
--Must comply with EU sanctions when involving subcontractors and suppliers.
--The tenderer must be able to provide information on subcontractors' criminal convictions and reliability during the contract performance stage.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must comply with the technical requirements for street surfacing works in Tartu city.
--The tenderer must be capable of performing the works on the listed street sections according to instructions.
--Works must be carried out in a manner that ensures functional interoperability and compliance with quality and warranty requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted according to the volume table.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306007_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract performance stage, requiring the tenderer to provide answers regarding subcontractors' criminal convictions and trustworthiness.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306007_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.7 KB

This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions for bidders, covering adherence to EU sanctions regarding subcontractors and suppliers, submission of a power of attorney for joint bids, and rules for marking business secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306007_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the evaluation methodology for the Tartu city street surfacing tender, where the sole criterion is the offer price, accounting for 100% of the score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306007_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.0 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the bidder's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, intended for familiarization rather than direct submission, as the actual ESPD must be completed electronically.

AlusdokumentDOC
Alusdokument_pindamised.docx -- 31.2 KB

This document outlines the general framework, legal basis, and scope of the public procurement for Tartu city street paving in 2026, including general requirements for bidders and procurement process principles.

LepinguprojektDOC
Lepinguprojekt_2026.doc -- 183.0 KB

This document presents the draft contract terms for the 2026 street surfacing works in Tartu, outlining the content of the future agreement for bidders.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Tehniline_kirjeldus_pindamised_Tartu_-2026.pd... -- 241.0 KB

This document describes the technical requirements and scope of road surfacing works in Tartu city, listing specific street sections and instructions for execution.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

81
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for Tartu city street surfacing works is generally well-structured and transparent, particularly in its use of electronic processes and justification for not dividing into lots. While comprehensive in documentation, a minor inconsistency in evaluation criteria description and a lack of explicit sustainability considerations are noted.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender appears largely compliant with procurement regulations, featuring reasonable submission timelines, appropriate CPV codes, and a clear justification for not dividing the procurement into lots. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Clarté75/100

The tender's requirements are generally clear and well-documented, with comprehensive AI-extracted requirements. However, there is a minor ambiguity regarding the evaluation criteria, as 'relative_weighting' is stated while Document 4 specifies '100% offer price,' which could cause slight confusion.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% offer price').
Exhaustivité90/100

All essential basic information, financial details, and timelines are provided. A comprehensive set of 9 documents is attached, including technical specifications, draft contract, and evaluation criteria, ensuring bidders have all necessary information.

The AI could not process the XML ESPD and XLS cost list, which limits full content verification, though their presence indicates completeness.
Équité95/100

The tender demonstrates high fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective evaluation criteria (100% price). The use of e-procurement and a well-reasoned justification for not dividing into lots further enhance transparency and equal access.

Aspect pratique85/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, providing an online opening place. Key practical details like contract duration are clearly specified, facilitating bidder participation.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated, though this is common and usually follows contract signing.
Cohérence des données75/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting descriptions of the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. '100% offer price' in Document 4).

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Durabilité20/100

The tender lacks explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals into the procurement process.

No explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Points forts

High transparency, especially regarding the justification for not dividing into lots.
Comprehensive documentation provided, including technical specifications and draft contract.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (100% price).
Full support for electronic submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable submission deadline (28 days).

Préoccupations

Minor inconsistency in the description of evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% offer price').
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
AI could not process all attached documents (XML, XLS), which limits full content verification.

Recommandations

1. Clarify and ensure consistency in the description of evaluation criteria across all tender documents.
2. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders, even for smaller projects.
3. Ensure all critical documents are provided in AI-readable formats where possible, or provide summaries for non-standard formats.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline