Retour aux appels d'offres

Service de location de tapis interchangeables pour 2026-2029

Ouvert
Date limite
2 jours restants
Mars 05, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
305822
Valeur
€31,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 05, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost of service for the entire contract period (36 months).100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 05, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 26, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 05, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 05, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€31,000
Durée
37 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
71
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€164,440
Offres moyennes
2.8
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
87%
1,449 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet de l'achat est la location de tapis pour divers bâtiments municipaux, y compris leur remplacement par l'entrepreneur à une fréquence déterminée par celui-ci.
Achats écologiquesSoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

20 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (10)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (2)
Technique (5)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-05 at 09:00:00.
--The bid must comply with the underlying documents specified in the tender documents.
--In the case of joint bidders, a power of attorney must be submitted using Form 2_Joint Bidders Power of Attorney.docx.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer must meet the mandatory exclusion grounds specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tenderer must meet the qualification conditions specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The tenderer must possess all necessary permits for providing the service.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The offered mats must comply with the properties (material, dimensions, color) specified in the technical description.
--The tenderer must ensure the installation of mats according to the technical description.
--The tenderer must ensure the maintenance of mats according to the technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include the total cost of the service for the entire 36-month contract period.
--The bid must include unit prices and total costs for each location and mat type for the years 2026-2029, submitted using Form 1_Volume and Cost Table.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
305822_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document outlines the tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, business secret declaration, confirmation of proposal compliance with tender documents, and confirmation of the cost submission structure.

Pakkuja esitab maksumuse tabeli vormil 1.XLS
Vorm 1_Mahu- ja maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 18.1 KB

This is Form 1, a volume and cost table that bidders must complete with unit prices and total costs for the exchangeable mat rental service for each location and mat type for the period 2026-2029.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305822_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document outlines that bids will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of the service for the entire 36-month contract period, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305822_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.9 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected format for bidder responses regarding qualification, but it is not intended for direct completion.

Lihthankemenetluse kordDOC
Lihthankemenetluse kord.docx -- 27.2 KB

This document outlines the simplified procurement procedure for the rental mat service tender, specifying requirements for offer submission, content, confidentiality, and language.

Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1_Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 17.1 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for Tori Rural Municipality Government's exchangeable mat rental service for 2026-2029, covering mat specifications (material, dimensions, color), installation, maintenance, and replacement frequency.

Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2_Hankelepingu projekt_eri ja üldtingimu... -- 27.6 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the rental service of exchange mats for the years 2026-2029, outlining service provision terms, deadlines, permit requirements, handover procedures, and contract cost calculation.

Vorm 2_Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm 2_Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 15.0 KB

This form is a power of attorney, allowing one bidder to authorize another to submit a tender and perform procurement-related actions for the mat rental service tender.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

71
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and objective evaluation criteria, but it contains notable inconsistencies regarding contract duration and financial reporting, which could impact bid accuracy.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears compliant with national procurement regulations, utilizing the ESPD and justifying the non-division of parts. The procedure type and CPV code are correctly assigned. A minor inconsistency exists with the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the estimated value being explicitly disclosed.

The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value, indicating a minor data inconsistency or potential for confusion.
Clarté70/100

While the general description, technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are clear, a significant discrepancy exists where financial requirements specify a 36-month period for cost submission, but the overall contract duration is stated as 37 months. This could lead to confusion and inaccurate bidding.

Financial requirements for total cost are based on a 36-month period, while the contract duration is stated as 37 months, creating a significant ambiguity for bidders.
Exhaustivité70/100

Most essential information and documents are provided, including detailed technical specifications and a draft contract. However, the contradiction between the 36-month financial requirement and the 37-month contract duration means a critical financial aspect is not fully or consistently defined.

The financial requirements for total cost are based on a 36-month period, which contradicts the stated 37-month contract duration, potentially leading to incomplete or incorrect financial proposals.
Équité85/100

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable preparation time, and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, ensuring equal access. The decision not to divide the procurement into parts is justified by economic efficiency.

Aspect pratique70/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are enabled, which is a strong practical advantage. The duration is clearly specified. However, a direct document URL is not explicitly provided (though implied by e-procurement platform access), and a specific contract start date is not given beyond the '2026-2029' timeframe.

A specific contract start date is not provided, only a general timeframe (2026-2029), which is common but could be more precise.
Direct document URLs are not explicitly listed, assuming access via an e-procurement platform.
Cohérence des données60/100

Significant inconsistencies are present, primarily the contradiction between the 37-month contract duration and the 36-month period specified for financial cost submission. Additionally, the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.

A significant inconsistency exists between the stated contract duration of 37 months and the financial requirement for a 36-month cost submission.
The 'Value Classified: Yes' flag contradicts the explicit disclosure of the estimated value.
Durabilité50/100

The tender explicitly includes 'Green Procurement' characteristics, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, it lacks specific social criteria or an innovation focus, and is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

No explicit social criteria are included in the tender.
No specific innovation focus is mentioned in the tender requirements.

Points forts

Clear and detailed technical specifications and draft contract provided.
Objective evaluation criteria based solely on the lowest price.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are fully supported.
Explicitly includes green procurement characteristics.
Reasonable submission deadline (28 days) for a simplified procedure.

Préoccupations

Significant inconsistency between the 37-month contract duration and the 36-month period for financial cost submission.
Minor data inconsistency with the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag despite the estimated value being public.
Lack of explicit social or innovation-focused criteria.
Absence of a specific contract start date beyond the general timeframe.

Recommandations

1. Urgently clarify and resolve the discrepancy between the 37-month contract duration and the 36-month financial reporting requirement to prevent inaccurate bids.
2. Consider incorporating relevant social criteria and fostering innovation in future tenders where applicable.
3. Ensure all tender documents are directly linkable or clearly accessible within the e-procurement system for maximum transparency and ease of access.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline