Retour aux appels d'offres

Construction de petites solutions pour l'intégration des élèves ayant des besoins éducatifs spéciaux au Lycée des Langues de Narva et à l'École Kreenholm de Narva

Fermé
Date limite
0 jours restants
Mars 02, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
305792
Valeur
€209,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 03, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total offer cost excluding taxes100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 03, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 23, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 02, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 02, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€209,000
Durée
7 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
77
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du présent marché public est la construction de petites solutions en tant qu'entrepreneur principal pour l'intégration des élèves ayant des besoins éducatifs spéciaux au Lycée des Langues de Narva et à l'École Kreenholm de Narva.
Financement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

17 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), providing information on the tenderer's qualification, financial, and technical capability.
--Present the cost structure of the bid.
--Submit the total cost of the bid excluding taxes.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and its first-tier subcontractors must not have mandatory exclusion grounds related to criminal offenses (fraud, money laundering, human trafficking).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must comply with the terms and conditions of the draft contract.
--The bid must meet the contracting authority's established conditions regarding qualification, financial, and technical capability (to be specified in the ESPD).
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Perform the construction of small-scale solutions as a main contractor for the integration of HEV students at Narva Keeltelütseum and Narva Kreenholmi Kool, according to the technical description.
--Adhere to the contract performance duration (7 months).
--Ensure the quality of the works performed according to the technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the total cost of the bid excluding taxes.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

9 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305792_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

This document outlines the mandatory exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors related to criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, detailing the information required regarding these grounds during the contract performance phase.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305792_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.8 KB

This document specifies key tender submission conditions, including joint bid authorization, confirmation of bid compliance, cost presentation structure, and requirements regarding subcontractors.

Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabel KeeltelütseumXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel nr 1 (Keeltelü... -- 23.9 KB

This document is the tender cost table for the Narva Keeltelütseum project, where bidders must submit unit prices and total costs for design and construction works.

Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabelXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel.xlsx -- 31.7 KB

This document is a tender cost table requiring bidders to detail expenses for construction works, including demolition and preparation tasks.

Lisa 3. Pakkumuse maksumustabel Kreenholmi KoolXLS
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumustabel nr 2 (Kreenhol... -- 24.3 KB

This document is a tender cost table for the construction of small solutions for the integration of SEN students at Narva Kreenholm School, requiring bidders to provide unit and total costs for design and external facilities.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305792_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation methodology, where the total offer cost excluding taxes is the sole criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305792_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the information required from companies regarding their qualification, financial, and technical capabilities for the Narva schools construction tender.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (HEV).docx -- 24.6 KB

This document describes the main contractor work for constructing small-scale solutions to integrate special educational needs (SEN) students into Narva Keeltelütseum and Narva Kreenholmi Kool, detailing the scope of work, deadlines, locations, and quality requirements.

Lisa 4. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu projekt (HEV).docx -- 48.9 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms and conditions between Narva City Government's Department of City Management and the contractor for building small-scale solutions in Narva schools.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

77
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, providing clear requirements and documentation for a construction project aimed at integrating special educational needs students. However, a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Open Procedure' and the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' raises concerns regarding legal compliance, clarity, fairness, and data consistency.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale70/100

The tender generally adheres to standard procurement practices with clear mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. However, the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' is highly unusual and potentially legally problematic for a procedure explicitly stated as 'Procedure: A' (typically an Open Procedure in Estonia), which generally prohibits negotiations. This inconsistency could lead to legal challenges. The CPV code is also quite broad.

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Broad CPV code (5867) for specific school construction work.
Clarté80/100

The tender description, AI-extracted requirements, and supporting documents (technical description, draft contract, cost tables) are generally clear and well-structured. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated. The only minor ambiguity arises from the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic, which, if applied to an Open Procedure, lacks clarity on how such negotiations would be conducted transparently.

Ambiguity regarding the application of 'Negotiation Allowed' within an 'Open Procedure'.
Exhaustivité90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic information, financial details, timelines, and location data. A comprehensive set of 10 documents, including detailed technical specifications, a draft contract, and specific cost tables for each school, ensures bidders have all necessary information for preparation.

Équité75/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable preparation time, objective lowest-price evaluation criteria, and e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic, if applied to an Open Procedure, could compromise transparency and equal treatment among bidders, potentially introducing subjectivity into the process. The decision not to divide the tender is justified.

Potential for reduced transparency and equal treatment due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Aspect pratique90/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and providing a clear URL for the opening. Financing information and contract duration are clearly specified. The lack of an explicit contract start date is standard and does not hinder practicality.

Cohérence des données60/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure) and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic. These two elements are typically mutually exclusive in standard procurement practices, creating a contradiction in the tender's fundamental process definition.

Fundamental inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Durabilité50/100

The project's core objective is socially beneficial (integration of SEN students). However, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement criteria, additional social clauses for the contractor's performance, or an innovation focus in the selection or execution requirements, despite being EU funded.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of additional social criteria for contractor performance.

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation with detailed technical specifications and cost tables.
Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Full transparency regarding estimated value and e-procurement support.
Project's strong social objective (integration of SEN students).
Reasonable submission deadline for preparation.

Préoccupations

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Potential for reduced transparency and fairness if negotiations are conducted in an Open Procedure.
Broad CPV code.
Lack of explicit green, social (beyond project scope), or innovation criteria in the tender requirements.

Recommandations

1. Clarify or correct the procedure type and negotiation characteristic to ensure legal compliance and transparency. If it is an Open Procedure, remove 'Negotiation Allowed.' If negotiations are intended, specify the correct procedure type (e.g., Negotiated Procedure) and outline the negotiation process.
2. Consider refining the CPV code to be more specific to school construction or renovation works.
3. Integrate explicit green procurement, social responsibility, or innovation criteria into future tenders, especially given EU funding.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline