Retour aux appels d'offres

Achat d'un microscope électronique à balayage de paillasse (MEB de paillasse)

Ouvert
Date limite
7 jours restants
Mars 09, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
305762
Valeur
€171,990
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 04, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost of the tender excluding VAT100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 04, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 02, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 09, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 09, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 09, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€171,990
Durée
5 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
86
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€80,024
Offres moyennes
1.8
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
96%
518 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet de la présente procédure d'achat est l'acquisition d'un microscope électronique à balayage de paillasse (MEB de paillasse) pour le laboratoire Archemy, conformément à la spécification technique fournie dans l'annexe 1 du HD. Le délai d'exécution du contrat est au plus tard 5 (cinq) mois après la conclusion du contrat d'achat. L'heure de début de conclusion du contrat indiquée dans l'avis d'appel d'offres est une estimation et n'est pas juridiquement contraignante.
Financement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

18 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (6)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically, including general, financial, and technical capability data.
--Submit a power of attorney for the representative signing the bid, if applicable, using the provided form.
--For joint bidders, submit a power of attorney and confirmation of joint and several liability using the provided form.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must provide general data in the ESPD, which typically includes declarations regarding mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm understanding and acceptance of the tender conditions.
--Bidders must confirm their ability to perform the contract.
--Bidders must confirm that the offered equipment is new.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The offered desktop scanning electron microscope must meet the minimum technical specifications described in Annex 1, including backscattered and secondary electron detectors and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
--Equivalent products are acceptable if they meet the specified requirements.
--Bidders must provide technical capability data via the ESPD.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must include the total cost without VAT.
--Bidders must provide financial capability data via the ESPD.
--Bidders must accept the price and payment terms stipulated in the draft contract.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

11 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
305762_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.6 KB

This document outlines mandatory bidder affirmations regarding understanding and acceptance of tender conditions, commitment to contract fulfillment, and new equipment quality, along with requirements for submitting a power of attorney for representatives or joint bidders.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305762_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.8 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for Tartu University's procurement of a desktop scanning electron microscope, where the sole criterion is the total cost of the tender excluding VAT, which is given a 100% weighting, and the lowest bid receives maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305762_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 64.3 KB

This document serves as an informational guide for completing the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document), outlining the general, financial, and technical capacity data expected from economic operators, which will be submitted electronically.

Annex 2 - 3 (forms)DOC
Annex 2 - 3 (forms).docx -- 30.1 KB

This document is a power of attorney template for the tenderer to authorize a representative to sign the tender for the University of Tartu's desktop scanning electron microscope procurement.

Annex 4 Draft Procurement ContractPDF
Annex 4 Draft Procurement Contract.pdf -- 202.0 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the purchase of a desktop scanning electron microscope, outlining general provisions, price and payment terms, contract duration, and device handover procedures.

Hankedokument, Tender Document (14)PDF
Hankedokument, Tender Document (14).pdf -- 216.4 KB

This document serves as an invitation to participate in the University of Tartu's open public procurement for a desktop scanning electron microscope, outlining general provisions and referring to qualification requirements.

Instructions for participating in the tendering procedurePDF
Instructions for participating in the tenderi... -- 197.1 KB

This document provides essential instructions for tenderers on accessing procurement documents, communicating with the Contracting Authority, and compiling their tender submissions for the desktop SEM acquisition.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 126.5 KB

This document provides instructions for participating in the procurement procedure, explaining the tender base documents, communication with the contracting authority, and bid submission requirements.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus, Annex 1 Technical DescriptionPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus, Annex 1 Technical... -- 188.2 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications and minimum requirements for the University of Tartu's Institute of Chemistry to purchase a desktop scanning electron microscope (SEM) with backscattered and secondary electron detectors and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope, allowing for equivalent product offers.

Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid).docx -- 30.4 KB

This document contains power of attorney forms for authorizing a bidder's representative to submit a bid and for joint bidders, including a confirmation of joint and several liability.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 198.8 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the general terms, price, payment conditions, delivery deadlines, and handover procedures for the acquisition of a desktop scanning electron microscope.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

86
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is well-structured and legally compliant, offering clear requirements and transparent evaluation criteria, but it lacks explicit sustainability aspects. The inclusion of 'or equivalent' for technical specifications significantly enhances fairness.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale90/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with reasonable submission deadlines, clearly defined procedure type, and appropriate CPV codes. The explicit inclusion of 'or equivalent' for technical specifications aligns with procurement regulations, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Mandatory disclosure requirements appear to be met.

Clarté90/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and requirements are well-documented and understandable, supported by comprehensive AI-extracted details. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest price, and performance conditions refer clearly to the draft contract.

Exhaustivité90/100

All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and location data are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are thoroughly defined, and a comprehensive set of documents is attached, ensuring a complete tender package.

Équité95/100

Fairness is exceptionally high due to full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, price-based evaluation criteria. Crucially, the 'or equivalent' clause for technical specifications prevents tailoring to specific companies, and e-procurement ensures equal access.

Aspect pratique80/100

Electronic submission is fully supported, and financing information is available. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the stated contract start date is noted as indicative and not legally binding, which could introduce minor planning uncertainty for bidders.

Contract start date is indicative and not legally binding
Cohérence des données85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include the 'Value Classified: Yes' status alongside a disclosed estimated value, and the indicative nature of the contract start date despite a specific date being provided.

Inconsistency between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value
Indicative nature of the contract start date
Durabilité40/100

While the tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks specific green procurement, social, or innovation-focused criteria within its requirements. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social aspects in requirements

Points forts

Clear and comprehensive documentation, including detailed technical specifications and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance, explicitly allowing 'or equivalent' products, ensuring fair competition.
Full electronic procurement support and transparent access to tender documents.
Objective evaluation criteria based solely on price, promoting transparency.
EU funding, suggesting adherence to broader EU standards.

Préoccupations

Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria within the tender requirements.
Minor data inconsistency regarding 'Value Classified' status versus the disclosed estimated value.
The contract start date is stated as indicative, which could affect bidder planning.
The XML ESPD document was not AI-analyzed, though its purpose was explained.

Recommandations

1. Integrate explicit sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, lifecycle costs, material sourcing) into future tenders, especially for EU-funded projects.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' status to avoid any ambiguity regarding financial transparency.
3. Provide a firm contract start date or a more precise timeframe for contract commencement to aid bidder planning.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline