Retour aux appels d'offres

Achat de médicaments alpha-galactosidase (A16AB03) et bêta-galactosidase (A16AB04)

Ouvert
Date limite
9 jours restants
Mars 12, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
305152
Valeur
€1,007,518
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 05, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Lowest total cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 05, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 05, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 12, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 12, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€1,007,518
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Fournitures
79
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€92,792
Offres moyennes
2.2
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
86%
3,220 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de cet appel d'offres public est de conclure des accords-cadres pour l'achat de médicaments alpha-galactosidase (A16AB03) et bêta-galactosidase (A16AB04) pour SA Pärnu Haigla jusqu'au 31.03.2028. La spécification technique et les quantités estimées sont fournies dans l'annexe 1 du HD. L'autorité contractante commande les produits en fonction des besoins réels, qui peuvent différer des quantités estimées.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

15 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (3)
Technique (2)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid must be submitted by 2026-03-12 10:00:00.
--The tenderer must complete and submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
--The tenderer must complete and submit the tender submission application (Annex 3 Form I).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The tenderer must not fall under any exclusion grounds, which must be declared in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The tenderer must submit an anti-sanctions declaration.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must fulfill and declare qualification requirements in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--The tenderer must confirm compliance with the tender conditions and qualification requirements in the tender submission application.
--The tenderer must agree to the terms of the draft framework agreement.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tenderer must provide technical data for the medicines alfaagalsidase (A16AB03) and betaagalsidase (A16AB04) according to the technical specification.
--The tenderer must be capable of supplying the medicines alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase according to the conditions described in the tender documents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must submit unit prices for the medicines alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase for two years on the price quotation form.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
305152_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 18.0 KB

This document outlines the compliance conditions for the procurement of alpha-galactosidase and beta-galactosidase medicines, requiring bidders to submit an application, power of attorney (if applicable), a declaration against sanctions, and the technical specification and price offer form.

HD lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ja hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
HD lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus ja hinnapakkumu... -- 17.9 KB

This document is a price offer form requiring bidders to submit technical specifications and unit prices for alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase drugs for a two-year period, including fields for bidder information.

HD lisa 3 vorm I - AvaldusDOC
HD lisa 3 vorm I - Avaldus.docx -- 91.6 KB

This form is an application for tender submission, requiring bidder details and confirmations of compliance with tender conditions and qualification criteria.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305152_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.3 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology for the procurement of alfaagalsidase and betaagalsidase medicines, where the sole evaluation criterion is the lowest total cost (with a 100% weighting).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305152_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.6 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the contracting authority's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds that bidders must declare electronically.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 93.9 KB

This document outlines the open procurement procedure for the purchase of alpha-galactosidase (A16AB03) and beta-galactosidase (A16AB04) medicines, detailing the general terms of the tender.

HD lisa 2 Raamlepingu projektPDF
HD lisa 2 Raamlepingu projekt.pdf -- 4.2 MB

This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms and legal framework for the procurement of alpha-galactosidase and beta-galactosidase drugs.

HD lisa 3 PakkumusvormidDOC
HD lisa 3 Pakkumusvormid.docx -- 95.6 KB

This document contains required tender submission forms, including a power of attorney for signing the tender and an application for participation in the procurement procedure with bidder details.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

79
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for specific pharmaceutical products demonstrates good clarity and fairness, leveraging e-procurement effectively. However, it presents a notable inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender adheres to legal requirements with reasonable deadlines (35 days), appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The use of ESPD and an open procedure aligns with national regulations. The generic procedure type code is a minor point.

Clarté70/100

While the overall description and requirements are well-documented and understandable, there is a significant inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria. The basic information states 'relative_weighting,' but the dedicated document specifies 'lowest total cost (100% weighting),' which can cause confusion for bidders.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative_weighting vs. 100% lowest cost).
Exhaustivité85/100

The tender is largely complete, providing all basic information, estimated value, and clear deadlines. The duration of the framework agreement until 31.03.2028 is specified in the description, and all necessary documents and forms are attached.

Équité90/100

This tender scores highly on fairness, offering full document access, disclosing the estimated value, and providing reasonable deadlines for preparation. The use of e-procurement and objective 'lowest total cost' evaluation criteria ensures equal access and transparency. Requirements appear generic for the product type and not tailored.

Aspect pratique80/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and e-procurement. The opening place URL is provided, and the duration of the framework agreement is clear. The absence of an explicit contract start date is a minor detail.

Cohérence des données70/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the inconsistency between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the basic characteristics and the 'lowest total cost (100% weighting)' in the evaluation document is a notable data inconsistency. The 'Value Classified: Yes' while the value is disclosed is also a minor inconsistency.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and disclosed estimated value.
Durabilité40/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While common for specific medical supplies, this represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations into the procurement process.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Points forts

Comprehensive documentation provided, including ESPD guide, draft contract, and detailed forms.
Strong commitment to e-procurement and electronic submission, enhancing accessibility and efficiency.
Clear and reasonable submission deadline, allowing sufficient time for preparation.
Transparency in disclosing the estimated value and using objective evaluation criteria (lowest cost).
Clear definition of the procurement objective and contract duration for the framework agreement.

Préoccupations

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria: The basic information states 'relative_weighting,' while the dedicated document specifies 'lowest total cost (100% weighting).'
Generic procedure type codes (Type A, Procedure A) in the basic information, although clarified in the main tender document.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, which is a missed opportunity for modern procurement practices.
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the disclosed estimated value.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated, though the end date of the framework agreement is clear.

Recommandations

1. Rectify the inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria by ensuring all tender documents and metadata consistently reflect either 'relative weighting' with specified criteria or 'lowest total cost.'
2. Consider integrating relevant sustainability criteria, such as environmentally friendly packaging or logistics, where feasible for pharmaceutical procurement.
3. Provide a more specific procedure type in the basic metadata to enhance clarity and compliance with reporting standards.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline