Retour aux appels d'offres

Conception et construction du parking du Centre de Santé de Väimela

Fermé

Date limite de soumission dépassée

La date limite de soumission de cet appel d'offres est dépassée et il n'accepte plus de candidatures. Les informations ci-dessous sont conservées à titre de référence.

Parcourir les appels d'offres actifs
Date limite
Expiré
Mars 02, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
304351
Valeur
€80,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 03, 2026
Organisation
Võru Vallavalitsus
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total cost of construction works.100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 03, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 23, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 02, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 02, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Voir l'original
Budget
€80,000
Durée
5 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
69
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif de l'autorité contractante est de reconstruire et d'agrandir le parking du Centre de Santé de Väimela, de rendre l'espace extérieur du bâtiment conforme aux exigences d'accessibilité et de rendre son utilisation aussi confortable que possible pour les visiteurs (y compris les personnes ayant des besoins spécifiques).
Financement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

11 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (6)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (2)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bid must be submitted according to the instructions for the open procurement procedure.
--The bid cost must be presented according to the specified structure.
--The bid must be submitted using the provided cost form (Maksumuse vorm_Väimela TK parkla.xlsx), specifying unit prices and total cost for different work stages.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and its first-tier subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion related to criminal offenses or other ethical violations as specified in the subcontractor control conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Joint tenderers must submit a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The design and construction of the parking lot must ensure universal accessibility, considering the needs of people with various disabilities and factors affecting accessibility.
--The bid must comply with the technical requirements and specifications for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Centre parking lot.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No explicit financial capability requirements (e.g., turnover, financial ratios) for the bidder are stated in the document summaries.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304351_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors related to criminal offenses and other ethical violations, and requires the tenderer to provide answers regarding these.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304351_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.4 KB

This document details tender compliance conditions, including requirements for joint bids, the mandatory structure for submitting tender costs, and general principles for tender submission and equivalence.

HD Lisa 1_Maksumuse vormXLS
Maksumuse vorm_Väimela TK parkla.xlsx -- 16.9 KB

This is a cost form for submitting a tender for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Centre parking lot, requiring bidders to specify unit prices and total costs for various work stages.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304351_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document specifies that bids for the design and construction of Väimela Health Center's parking lot will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of construction works, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304351_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.3 KB

This document is an explanatory European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) outlining the qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Väimela Health Center parking lot design and construction tender, intended for review, not for submission.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
Hankedokument HD- Väimela Tervisekeskuse park... -- 37.8 KB

This is the tender document for Võru Rural Municipality Government's public procurement "Design and Construction of Väimela Health Center Parking Lot," providing instructions for preparing a bid in an open tender procedure.

HD Lisa 2-Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)DOC
Tehniline kirjeldus (TK)_Väimela TK parkla.do... -- 26.8 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements and specifications for the design and construction of the Väimela Health Center parking lot.

TK Lisa 3 - ligipääsetavuse hinnangPDF
TK Lisa 3 - ligipääsetavuse hinnang.pdf -- 1.7 MB

This document is an accessibility assessment for Väimela Health Centre, detailing the needs of people with various disabilities and factors affecting accessibility to ensure universal access in the design and construction of the parking lot.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

69
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a strong focus on accessibility. However, a critical inconsistency in the stated evaluation criteria significantly impacts its clarity and data consistency.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears largely compliant with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines and proper CPV codes. The 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure' is a minor ambiguity that could warrant clarification.

•'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic for an 'Open Procedure' (Type A) is unusual and potentially ambiguous.
Clarté60/100

While the project description and individual requirements are clear, there is a direct contradiction between the stated 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria in the characteristics and the document specifying 'solely based on total cost'. This is a significant clarity issue.

•Direct contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Exhaustivité70/100

Most essential information is provided, including basic details, value, and duration. However, the lack of explicit financial capability requirements for bidders and the inability to analyze key technical and contractual documents (due to file formats) represent minor gaps.

•No explicit financial capability requirements for bidders.
•Key technical and contractual documents (e.g., draft contract, detailed project plans) are in unanalyzed .zip/.png formats, limiting full content assessment.
Équité80/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement. The evaluation criteria, if 'lowest price only', are objective, though the contradiction noted under clarity slightly impacts transparency.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria slightly impacts transparency.
Aspect pratique75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the duration is clearly specified. While a contract start date isn't explicit, the overall process appears practical. Financing conditions are mentioned but not fully detailed.

•Financing conditions are mentioned but lack full detail.
•Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Cohérence des données50/100

There is a critical inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria, with 'relative_weighting' stated in characteristics but 'lowest price only' in the evaluation document. This is a major flaw in data consistency.

•Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
•Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Durabilité60/100

The tender includes a strong social aspect by emphasizing universal accessibility for people with disabilities. However, it lacks explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria, as noted by automated checks.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•No specific innovation focus.

Points forts

Clear project description and objectives, including universal accessibility.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Value disclosed and reasonable submission deadline.
Strong social aspect through accessibility requirements.

Préoccupations

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Lack of explicit financial capability requirements for bidders.
Key technical and contractual documents are in unanalyzed formats (.zip, .png).
Ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Absence of explicit green procurement or innovation criteria.

Recommandations

1. Immediately clarify and correct the contradictory statements regarding evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and avoid bidder confusion.
2. Consider adding explicit financial capability requirements to mitigate risks for a construction project.
3. Provide summaries or accessible formats for key technical and contractual documents to enhance transparency and completeness.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline