Retour aux appels d'offres

Concours d'architecture paysagère pour l'espace vert invitant de Skoone

Ouvert
Date limite
6 jours restants
Mars 09, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
303410
Valeur
€250,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Décembre 08, 2025
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Jury decision of the idea competition100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Décembre 08, 2025

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 02, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 09, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 09, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€250,000
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
76
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif du concours d'idées ouvert en une seule étape est de créer un concept d'architecture paysagère pour un espace vert moderne et invitant dans la zone des douves du bastion de Skoone, offrant aux écoles du centre-ville la possibilité d'organiser des cours d'éducation physique sous forme d'espace vert de type parc, ainsi qu'un espace public extérieur de haute qualité pour tous les résidents et visiteurs de la ville pour les loisirs et les activités physiques.
Achats écologiquesSoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

16 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (10)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (1)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Submit a concept design that adheres to the competition brief, purpose, and general task.
--The design proposal must demonstrate quality, functionality, environmental friendliness, and cost-effectiveness.
--The concept design must adhere to mandatory submission conditions, including language requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as detailed in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must meet the qualification requirements outlined in the ESPD conditions.
--Joint participants must designate a common representative.
--Joint participants must confirm joint and several liability for the implementation of the design proposal.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Key personnel (e.g., project manager, architect, landscape architect, constructor) must meet the specific professional level and competence required for each role for the design contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided summaries.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

9 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
303410_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.4 KB

This document outlines the mandatory submission conditions for the landscape architecture competition's concept design, emphasizing language, anonymity, non-encryption, and intellectual property rights requirements that bidders must confirm.

NimekaartDOC
Vorm A_Nimekaart.docx -- 19.3 KB

This form collects essential participant identification details, including company information, author names, and prize payment preferences, to be submitted with the tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303410_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.9 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the landscape architecture idea competition, where the jury's decision will be based on the design proposal's adherence to the brief, quality, functionality, environmental friendliness, and cost-effectiveness.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303410_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 38.6 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) conditions, detailing the contracting authority's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds for the Skoone green space landscape architecture competition, but it is not to be filled out directly.

Lähteülesanne koos lisadegaDOC
Lähteülesanne_SkooneLiikumaKutsuvRoheruum.doc... -- 4.3 MB

This document serves as the brief for the Skoone inviting green space landscape architecture competition, outlining its purpose and general task.

Tööde etapid ja tähtajadDOC
Lisa 3_1 Tööde etapid ja tähtajad.docx -- 26.3 KB

This document outlines the project's work stages, deadlines, required studies, sketch preparation and submission, and corresponding payment schedules for the landscape architecture competition.

Projekteerimistööde lepingDOC
Projekteerimistööde leping 0512.docx -- 66.9 KB

This document outlines the specific qualification requirements for key personnel (project manager, architect, landscape architect, constructor, etc.) mandated for the design contract, detailing the required professional level and competence for each role.

Ideekonkursi korraldamise kordDOC
RHAD_Skoone_.docx -- 52.7 KB

This document outlines the general organizational terms for the Skoone inspiring green space landscape architecture idea competition, aiming to conclude a design contract with the winner and detailing participant obligations.

Ühisosalejate volikiriDOC
Vorm B_Ühisosalejate volikiri.docx -- 19.3 KB

This form is a power of attorney for joint participants, designating a common representative for participation in the landscape architecture competition and confirming joint and several liability for the implementation of the design proposal.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

76
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This is a well-structured idea competition for landscape architecture services, demonstrating good clarity and fairness with comprehensive documentation. Minor improvements could enhance formal data completeness and explicit detail on contract duration.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears compliant with national regulations, defining the procedure type as an idea competition and providing a reasonable submission period. The use of 'IK' for procedure type is understood in the local context, though standard classification codes are not fully detailed. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarté80/100

The tender description is clear, and requirements are well-documented across multiple attachments, including an ESPD explanatory guide and specific submission conditions. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated, enhancing transparency for bidders.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most essential information, such as title, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. However, a formal NUTS code for location is missing, and while work stages are detailed, a single explicit contract duration field for the design services is not present. Financial requirements for bidders are not explicitly mentioned.

Missing formal NUTS code.
Contract duration not explicitly stated as a single field.
Équité85/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective and transparent evaluation criteria, and support for e-procurement and electronic submission. Requirements for key personnel are standard for the profession and do not appear tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, an explicit contract start date is not provided, and the duration is detailed through work stages rather than a single field. Specific financing information beyond the estimated value and contracting authority is not available.

No explicit contract start date.
Specific financing information beyond the organization is not detailed.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. No suspensions or disputes are reported, indicating good data integrity.

Durabilité70/100

The tender explicitly states 'Green Procurement' and the project's description strongly emphasizes creating a 'movement-inviting green space' with social benefits for residents and schools. While not EU funded, it demonstrates a clear commitment to environmental and social aspects.

Points forts

Comprehensive and clear documentation.
Transparent and objective evaluation criteria.
Reasonable submission deadline for complex design work.
Explicitly green procurement with strong social aspects.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.

Préoccupations

Missing formal NUTS code for geographical clarity.
Contract duration for the design services is not explicitly stated as a single field.
No explicit financial requirements for bidders.
Some document formats (.xml, .asice) were not analyzable by AI.
Specific funding source details beyond the organization are not specified.

Recommandations

1. Include the formal NUTS code to enhance geographical clarity and data completeness.
2. Clearly state the estimated contract duration for the design services in a dedicated field.
3. Provide explicit financial requirements for bidders, if any, or clarify their absence.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline