Retour aux appels d'offres

Reconstruction du monument commémoratif et de ses abords

Ouvert
Date limite
7 jours restants
Mars 10, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
296202
Valeur
€20,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 26, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Bid price100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 26, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 03, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 10, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 10, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Mars 23, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€20,000
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Reconstruction des fondations et des escaliers du monument commémoratif de la Guerre d'Indépendance de Viru-Nigula (situé à Kunda tee 6a, village de Viru-Nigula, municipalité de Viru-Nigula).
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

14 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (3)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (5)
Technique (3)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-10 12:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the format specified by the contracting authority (implied by Hankepass and ESPD).
--The tender is for the entire scope of work, as splitting it into parts would make contract execution overly complex and potentially jeopardize proper fulfillment.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general procurement law applies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a bid price according to the specified structure.
--Bidders must explain equivalency if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for the reconstruction of the foundation and stairs of the Viru-Nigula War of Independence memorial.
--The scope of work includes materials, labor, and equipment.
--Service provision by a single bidder ensures efficient and economical use of the contracting authority's financial resources.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 20,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a detailed price calculation for the reconstruction works, including costs for materials and labor.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
296202_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

Bidders must confirm adherence to tender conditions, submit the bid price according to the structure, and explain equivalency if necessary, also providing a joint bidder authorization if applicable.

Lisa 1 Maksumuse tabelXLS
Lisa 3 Maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 12.3 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost estimate for the reconstruction of the memorial and its surroundings, including the cost of materials and labor.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
296202_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluation is based solely on price, where the lowest bid receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
296202_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 36.2 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's own declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses.

Juhised pakkujaleDOC
Juhised pakkujale_.docx -- 36.4 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the reconstruction of a memorial and its surroundings tender organized by Viru-Nigula Municipality Government.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_.docx -- 25.2 KB

The contracting authority seeks a construction company to reconstruct the foundation and stairs of the Viru-Nigula War of Independence memorial, with the scope of work including materials, labor, and equipment.

Lisa 2 Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 32.9 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms, deadlines, and contract documents for the reconstruction of the Viru-Nigula War of Independence memorial.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for memorial reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a single evaluation criterion.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. The financing condition 'KOV' (local government) is standard.

Clarté80/100

The description of the reconstruction work is clear. Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria (though singular) are specified. Conditions for participation are generally clear.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and duration. Several key documents are attached, such as the contract draft and cost estimate table. However, the 'Hankepass' in international format is XML and not directly analyzable by AI, and the 'Vastavustingimused' document is marked as required but its content summary is brief.

XML format of ESPD not directly analyzable by AI.
Équité85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the e-procurement nature promotes fairness. The evaluation criteria are objective (price-based). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified. The contract start date is provided. Financing is indicated as 'KOV'. The duration is specified. However, the reliance on 'Hankepass' and potentially complex XML formats might pose minor practical challenges for some bidders.

Potential complexity for bidders unfamiliar with 'Hankepass' or specific XML formats.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Durabilité50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Points forts

Clear description of works
Reasonable deadlines and contract start date
E-submission and e-procurement enabled
Objective evaluation criterion (price)

Préoccupations

Lack of sustainability considerations
Sole reliance on price for evaluation
Potential complexity of submission documents (Hankepass/ESPD)

Recommandations

1. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, use of sustainable materials).
2. Consider adding qualitative evaluation criteria alongside price to ensure best value.
3. Provide clearer guidance or examples for the 'Hankepass' and ESPD submission process.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline