Retour aux appels d'offres

Fourniture de cours de formation SolidWorks

Ouvert
Date limite
3 jours restants
Mars 06, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
013317-2026
Valeur
£72,000
Lieu
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, Royaume-Uni
Publié
Février 23, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 13, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Février 27, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 06, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Mars 31, 2026

Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
£72,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Autre
64
Score de qualité/100
Bon

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Un contrat pour la fourniture de cours de formation SolidWorks pour le personnel de DSTL.

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

6 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (1)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (2)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit bid by 2026-03-06T17:00:00+00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Registration on the Central Digital Platform.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to provide Solidworks training courses.
--Completion of a cyber security process.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

4 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

OCDS RecordDOC
013317-2026_ocds_record.json

The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) is seeking providers for Solidworks training courses for its staff through an open procurement process.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013317-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS data package provides structured information about a tender from the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory for Solidworks training courses for its staff, detailing the buyer and tender initiation.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013317-2026_official.pdf

This tender notice invites bids for the provision of Solidworks training courses for Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) staff, requiring completion of a cyber security process and registration on the Central Digital Platform.

Tender NoticeHTM
013317-2026.html

This tender notice invites companies to bid for the provision of SolidWorks training courses for DSTL staff, with an estimated value of £60,000, requiring completion of a cyber security process and registration on the Central Digital Platform.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

64
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender presents a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations, impacting overall transparency and fairness. While basic information is provided, critical details for comprehensive bidding are lacking.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. Compliance with national (UK) procurement regulations appears to be in place, with requirements like registration on a central digital platform. The missing reveal date is a minor transparency issue, but does not indicate a breach of compliance regarding the submission period.

Missing reveal date for full transparency of the tender period start.
Clarté55/100

The core service description is clear and unambiguous. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity for potential bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly mentioned.
Exhaustivité65/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are provided. Documents are attached. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and a detailed set of evaluation criteria, which are essential for a comprehensive bid.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Mandatory exclusion grounds not explicitly mentioned.
Équité55/100

The tender's requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria poses a significant risk of subjective assessment, undermining fairness. The flagged 'No e-submission' (if accurate) could also limit equal access for all potential bidders.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria, leading to potential subjectivity.
Potential lack of electronic submission (if 'No e-submission' is accurate).
Aspect pratique65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the flagged 'No e-submission' is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden and reducing efficiency for bidders.

Lack of electronic submission support.
Cohérence des données85/100

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person' and procedure codes, but these do not impact the overall integrity of the core data.

Empty 'Liable Person' field.
Empty 'Type Code' and 'Procedure Code' fields.
Durabilité25/100

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete absence of integrated sustainability principles, which is a common area for improvement in public procurement.

No green procurement considerations.
No social criteria mentioned.

Points forts

Clear service description and purpose.
Estimated value and contract duration are clearly specified.
Appropriate CPV code assigned.
No reported disputes or suspensions.
All tender documents are available for review.

Préoccupations

Critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria.
Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements.
Potential absence of electronic submission capabilities.
No integration of sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations.
Missing tender reveal date, impacting full transparency of the tender period.

Recommandations

1. Clearly define and publish all evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness in the assessment process.
2. Provide comprehensive details on mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements to ensure completeness for bidders.
3. Implement or clarify electronic submission capabilities to enhance accessibility and efficiency for all potential suppliers.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline