Travaux de restauration et de conservation des peintures murales intérieures de l'église de la Découverte de la Sainte Croix du complexe de Vilnius Kalvarijų, Vilnius, rue Kalvarijų 327

This tender for restoration works on a church interior is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and potentially fairness.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and is classified as an open procedure. The estimated value is disclosed and within limits. The primary concern is the missing reveal date for the opening of submissions, which is a minor procedural oversight. The deadline is also noted as potentially short.

The description of the works is specific, and the attached documents provide detailed requirements for qualifications, specialist experience, and bid forms. The contract draft is also provided. The main clarity issue is the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria.

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. A significant number of documents (12) are provided, including qualification requirements, bid forms, and contract drafts. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and location information within the main notice reduces completeness.

The tender is an open competition with a disclosed value, promoting fairness. The use of standard forms like ESPD and clear qualification requirements contribute to a level playing field. The absence of specific company tailoring is noted. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria, however, could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and requires clarification. The contract duration is specified, and financing information is implied by the estimated value. The lack of explicit location details in the main notice and the potential for a short deadline impact practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date) are logical in sequence. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is appropriate for the described works.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.