Travaux de réparation des principaux fossés de drainage dans les zones cadastrées de Židikai et Ukrinai du district de Mažeikiai : Vičiupio up. (Truikio up.), V-1, V-1-1, V-2, n° 1, et les structures s'y trouvant (Enquête publiée)

This tender for drainage ditch repair is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial transparency, impacting its overall quality.

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

The tender provides a clear description of the works required and lists numerous essential documents, including technical specifications and contract drafts. The requirements are generally well-documented, although specific eligibility and technical capability requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant gap in completeness. A substantial number of documents are attached, covering various aspects of the procurement.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The full document access is implied by the number of attached documents. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the provided information does not explicitly confirm e-submission capabilities or provide a direct URL for document access. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

While the 'Specialiosios sąlygos' document mentions 'green procurement criteria', the specific details are not provided in the summary. There is no explicit mention of social aspects or innovation focus, limiting the assessment of sustainability efforts.