Travaux de réparation générale de l'école Šakiai „Varpo” (installation d'une salle multisensorielle) (ouvert)

This tender for renovation works at Šakių 'Varpo' school is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and EU funding. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial value, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and has a clear CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and the procedure is open. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could impact legal defensibility if challenged.

The description of the works is clear, and the existence of multiple attached documents suggests detailed requirements are available. The CPV code is appropriate. The main clarity issue stems from the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, their specific content regarding eligibility, technical, and financial requirements is not detailed in the summary.

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. All documents appear to be accessible. The lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, while not explicitly unfair, reduces transparency. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender is active and EU-funded, with a specified contract duration. However, the lack of explicit e-submission instructions and the absence of a contract start date reduce practicality. The value not being disclosed also hinders practical financial planning for potential bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender is active and has a clear status.

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive aspect. However, there are no explicit mentions or requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its sustainability score.