Travaux de construction et de reconstruction d'ouvrages de génie civil d'autres usages, y compris les travaux de construction de réseaux d'évacuation des eaux pluviales à Purienų g. 48, Šiauliai

This tender for construction and reconstruction works is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific financial details and explicit evaluation criteria. The e-procurement characteristic is positive, though some practical submission details are missing.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses appropriate CPV codes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and the procedure is open. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed estimated value, which can impact legal scrutiny.

The description of the works is clear, and requirements are referenced in specific annexes (Technical Specification). The presence of general terms and conditions, and specific annexes for specialists, experience, and proposal forms enhances clarity. However, explicit evaluation criteria are missing.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, contract duration, and a substantial number of attached documents. The submission deadline and opening date are specified. However, crucial financial information (estimated value) and detailed submission requirements are absent.

The tender is an open competition and utilizes e-procurement, promoting fairness. Access to documents is provided. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for transparency. Requirements appear standard for construction tenders and not tailored to specific companies.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, specific details regarding the e-submission process, direct URL for document submission, and financing information are not provided, reducing overall practicality.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The contract duration is logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The main inconsistency is the lack of disclosed financial value, which is a critical data point.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While not mandatory for all tenders, the absence of these elements limits the sustainability score.