MUSÉE NATIONAL D'ART M. K. ČIURLIONIS MUSÉE-MAISON M. K. ČIURLIONIS

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and EU funding. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and has a very short submission deadline, impacting practicality and potentially fairness.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline is exceptionally short. No disputes are reported. The procedure is open, indicating a standard legal framework.

The description of the service (construction supervision) and the subject (M. K. Čiurlionis House Museum) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements list general categories, but specific criteria for evaluation are missing, which affects overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Two tender documents are available. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and a reveal date for submissions could be considered a completeness issue for bidders.

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the extremely short submission deadline (7 days) raises concerns about fairness, as it may not provide sufficient time for all potential bidders to prepare a compliant submission. No specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. The contract duration is specified. However, the very short submission deadline (March 3rd for a tender published likely around late February) makes it impractical for many potential bidders. The lack of explicit e-submission details beyond 'e-procurement' is a minor drawback.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code is provided. No disputes or suspensions are reported. Dates are logically presented, with an opening date following the submission deadline.

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.