Compléments alimentaires

This tender for food supplements is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could impact legal compliance if not clarified.

The description of the procured item ('Maisto papildai') is clear. Several key documents are provided, including technical specifications and contract conditions. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes the overall assessment process less clear.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. A substantial number of documents are attached, contributing to completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting fairness. Access to documents is provided, and it is an e-procurement process. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a direct URL for document submission and the lack of explicit financing information or contract start date reduce practicality. The deadline, while provided, might be considered short by some potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The data presented is consistent.

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive aspect. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, leading to a moderate score in this category.