Conception, fourniture et installation d'améliorations aux terrains de netball existants

This tender for netball court improvements is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition', suggesting adherence to relevant regulations for its value. The deadline, while potentially tight, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works required is clear and specific, detailing the nature of improvements to the netball courts. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of detailed submission requirements mean that crucial information for bidders is missing.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The criteria for selection are not specified, which could be a concern for fairness if not addressed in the full documentation. The process appears to be a standard open competition, which is generally fair.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.