Retour aux appels d'offres

Fourniture de réparation et de construction de mur – Cimetière de St Andrew the Less, Cambridge

Ouvert
Date limite
9 jours restants
Mars 13, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
014561-2026
Valeur
£90,000
Lieu
East Anglia, Royaume-Uni
Publié
Février 24, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 18, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 06, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 13, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 11, 2026

Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
£90,000
Durée
3 mois
Lieu
East Anglia
Type
Autre
59
Score de qualité/100
Acceptable

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Le cimetière de St Andrew the Less est maintenant fermé et relève donc de la responsabilité de l'autorité locale pour son entretien et sa maintenance. Le mur ouest est classé et nécessite la reconstruction d'une section de 12 m et une réparation soignée à l'aide de briques et de matériaux appropriés pour d'autres zones. Nous recherchons une entreprise expérimentée pour agir en tant qu'entrepreneur principal afin d'entreprendre ces travaux, au nom du Conseil, afin de fournir une réparation durable et rentable qui nécessite un minimum d'entretien continu.

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

18 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (6)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (2)
Technique (7)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-03-13T00:00:00.
--Propose a solution for the maintenance and upkeep of the Churchyard of St Andrew the Less west wall.
--Detail how the re-build of the 12m listed wall section will be undertaken.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender description. Bidders are advised to consult the full tender documents for standard legal exclusion criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Be a suitably experienced company.
--Be able to act as Principal Contractor.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Possess suitable experience in construction work, specifically involving listed buildings or sympathetic repair using appropriate materials.
--Demonstrate the ability to undertake a re-build of a 12m section of a listed wall.
--Demonstrate the ability to perform sympathetic repair using appropriate bricks and materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Be able to undertake a project with an estimated contract value of 90,000 EUR.
--Provide a cost-effective repair solution.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

Aucun document traité n'est disponible pour cet appel d'offres.

Les documents apparaîtront ici une fois qu'ils auront été téléchargés et analysés.

59
Acceptable

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender provides clear basic information and a good description of the required works for a listed wall repair. However, it is significantly hampered by the complete absence of accessible tender documents and explicit evaluation criteria, which are critical for a fair and transparent procurement process.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The procedure type is clear, and the CPV code is correctly assigned, with no disputes reported. However, the explicit detailing of mandatory exclusion grounds is missing from the provided text, and the full tender documents are not available for review, which is a significant limitation.

Incomplete detailing of mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text
Lack of content for full tender documents
Clarté60/100

The description of the works and the AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be judged.

Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Exhaustivité50/100

While basic metadata is present, the complete absence of content for the 5 tender documents is a severe deficiency, preventing bidders from accessing full scope and terms. The lack of evaluation criteria also contributes to incompleteness.

Lack of content for tender documents
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Équité40/100

The lack of access to full tender documents and the complete absence of evaluation criteria are major fairness issues, hindering transparency and equal opportunity. The absence of an e-submission option is also a drawback.

Lack of access to full tender documents
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Aspect pratique60/100

The absence of electronic submission and the lack of accessible document URLs (or content) present practical hurdles for bidders. While contract duration and start date are clear, the overall practical execution for bidders is hampered by the missing documents.

No electronic submission option
Lack of content for tender documents
Cohérence des données90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor omissions include an empty 'Liable Person' field and empty codes for the procedure type, but these do not significantly impact overall consistency.

Empty code fields for procedure type and procedure
Missing 'Liable Person' field
Durabilité20/100

There is no explicit mention of any sustainability, social, or innovation criteria within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of focus on these modern procurement aspects.

Lack of sustainability criteria
Lack of social aspects

Points forts

Clear description of the required works and project scope
All basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, duration) is provided
CPV code and NUTS code are correctly assigned
Requirements for bidder experience and technical capability are well-defined

Préoccupations

No access to the full tender documents, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a complete response
Complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, leading to a lack of transparency and potential unfairness
No electronic submission option, which is a practical drawback in modern procurement
Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text
No mention of sustainability, social, or innovation aspects

Recommandations

1. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible and their content is processed for comprehensive analysis.
2. Clearly define and publish objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to streamline the bidding process and enhance accessibility.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline