Élaboration de projets de décisions sur les conditions d'urbanisme et les investissements d'utilité publique pour les besoins de la Gmina Krokowa

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly regarding the procurement procedure, evaluation criteria, and estimated value, which severely impact fairness despite clear service description.

Legal compliance is moderate due to the missing procedure type, undisclosed estimated value, and the absence of a reveal date, which prevents verification of the full legal publication period. CPV codes are correctly assigned, and there are no disputes.

Clarity is poor, primarily because no evaluation criteria are specified, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their offers will be judged. While the service description and technical requirements are clear, the lack of detailed exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements further reduces clarity.

Completeness is moderate. Basic information is present, but critical details such as the estimated value, contract duration, and evaluation criteria are missing. Furthermore, the content of key tender documents (e.g., SWZ) was not extracted, hindering a full assessment of the tender's completeness.

Fairness is significantly compromised due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the undisclosed estimated value. These omissions create an opaque bidding environment, making it difficult for potential suppliers to prepare competitive and informed offers. While e-procurement is enabled, the lack of transparency is a major concern.

Practicality is moderate. Electronic submission is supported, which is a positive. However, the absence of a contract start date, duration, and specific financing information makes it challenging for bidders to plan and assess the feasibility of the project.

Data consistency is moderate due to several unpopulated key fields, including the procedure type, estimated value, liable person, and contract duration. While dates are consistent and there are no disputes, these gaps indicate incomplete data entry.

Sustainability aspects are entirely absent from this tender. There is no mention of green procurement criteria, social considerations, or an innovation focus.