TRAVAUX DE RÉNOVATION CSIP DE VAUGHAN HOUSE

This tender for refurbishment works demonstrates good clarity on evaluation criteria and utilizes an e-tendering portal, but suffers from a lack of transparency regarding the estimated contract value and absence of sustainability considerations.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value, even for a below-threshold tender, raises transparency concerns that could impact compliance with best practices, though not necessarily a direct legal breach for this type of procedure.

The tender description is concise and the evaluation criteria (65% quality, 35% price) are clearly stated. AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview, directing bidders to full documents for specifics, which is standard practice.

Most essential information like title, organization, deadlines, duration, and documents are provided. However, the estimated contract value is explicitly not disclosed, and some basic fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty, which are notable gaps.

Full document access and e-procurement via a dedicated portal promote equal access. The evaluation criteria split is transparent, and requirements appear generic. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated contract value significantly hinders fairness by preventing potential bidders from adequately assessing the opportunity and preparing competitive bids.

The tender supports electronic submission, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The availability of documents via the e-tendering portal is practical. The lack of an estimated value, however, can make it impractical for bidders to gauge the financial scale of the project.

Dates are logical and there are no reported disputes. However, several key fields are unpopulated (e.g., Liable Person, Type Code, Procedure Code, Estimated Value), indicating inconsistencies in data entry.

The tender documentation does not include any explicit criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.