COV - Prestation de services d'hébergement avec soutien et de soutien mobile pour les jeunes de 16 ans et plus (2026)

This tender for supported accommodation services is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and eligibility criteria. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and specific submission requirements, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are noted. The requirement for Ofsted registration is a regulatory compliance point.

The description of the service is clear, outlining the target demographic and the objectives of supported accommodation and floating support. Eligibility requirements, particularly the Ofsted registration, are clearly stated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start date are present. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of detailed submission requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents limit its completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The eligibility criteria, particularly the Ofsted registration, are objective. The procedure is competitive. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair approach.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of document content make it less practical for potential bidders to fully assess and prepare their submissions. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start date and submission deadline are distinct and sequential.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects beyond the core service delivery, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.