Navigateurs Spécialisés 'Changing Futures'

This tender for 'Changing Futures Specialist Navigators' is in the planning stage and outlines a clear service description and estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general regulatory requirements, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while short, is specified. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural omission.

The description of the service is clear, outlining the target group and the nature of the support. The division into two separate services is also mentioned. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves ambiguity on how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. However, crucial details regarding specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing, significantly impacting the completeness of the documentation.

The tender provides access to the full document and discloses the estimated value. The criteria for selection are not specified, which could lead to concerns about objective assessment. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender is in the planning stage, and details on e-submission are not provided. The contract start date is specified, but financing information is absent. The lack of detailed submission requirements makes it difficult to assess the practicalities of preparing a bid.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced. The tender status is 'planning', which is consistent with the lack of detailed requirements.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender notice. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.