Services de développeur web et maintenance de support

This tender for Web Developer Services and Support Maintenance is in a 'planning' status, which explains the significant gaps in critical information. While basic details are present, the lack of transparency and comprehensive documentation severely impacts its quality for potential bidders.

The tender lacks a defined procedure type and the estimated value is classified, which are fundamental legal disclosure requirements. While CPV codes are appropriate, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the provided information raises compliance concerns. The 7-day submission window (if reveal is today) is also very tight.

The core service description is clear, but the tender suffers from a significant lack of detailed requirements and, critically, no specified evaluation criteria. The AI-extracted requirements are generic, making it difficult for bidders to understand the precise scope and how their proposals will be judged.

While basic information like title, organization, and duration is present, the tender is highly incomplete. Crucially, there are no accessible tender documents, the estimated value is classified, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing. This makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive response.

Fairness is severely compromised by the lack of accessible tender documents, the classified estimated value, and the complete absence of evaluation criteria. Without these, bidders cannot compete on an equal footing or understand the basis of the award decision. The lack of e-submission also creates an unnecessary barrier.

The tender provides a clear contract start date and duration, which is practical. However, the lack of accessible tender documents, the absence of e-submission, and the classified financial information significantly hinder the practical ability of potential bidders to prepare and submit a proposal.

Dates are logical and consistent (submission before start, duration specified). There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, several key fields such as 'Type,' 'Procedure,' and 'Liable Person' are unpopulated or marked as 'None,' indicating incomplete data entry.

The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the procurement process.