T26-018BUS Conception et développement d'une expérience interactive numérique et immersive de parcours des lieux de Derry Girls

Overall, the tender documentation provides clear project details and requirements, but the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and a failed document download significantly compromise transparency and fairness.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and the submission period from today's date (38 days) is generally reasonable for an open procedure. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant legal transparency issue, and the missing reveal date prevents full assessment of the publication period.

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are well-articulated and understandable, providing a clear scope of work. Nevertheless, the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the failure to download one of the listed tender documents ('Tender Notice'), which may contain essential information.

Electronic submission via etendersNI is supported, and the technical requirements appear generic enough to avoid tailoring. However, the fundamental absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the fairness and transparency of the procurement process, as bidders cannot objectively prepare their offers.

Electronic submission is clearly supported, and the contract start date and duration are specified, which aids practical planning. The failed download of a tender document, however, presents a practical hurdle for potential bidders seeking full information.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the contradiction between 'Estimated Value' being disclosed and 'Value Classified: Yes', as well as some empty fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes.

The tender explicitly mentions an 'innovative' visitor experience, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, there is no mention of specific green procurement criteria or social aspects, which limits its overall sustainability score.