Revue de littérature : Toxines cyanobactériennes dans les poissons résultant de la prolifération de cyanobactéries

The tender is well-structured with a clear scope, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and access to full documentation, impacting overall quality.

The tender includes a CPV code and specifies an open competition procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for a below-threshold procurement. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of document content are notable omissions in ensuring a clear and compliant procedure.

The description provides a comprehensive overview of the research need, linking it to the FSA's strategy and detailing specific objectives and desired outcomes for the literature review. Requirements for technical capability are also quite detailed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the crucial 'Documents with content/summaries' is zero, and there is no content for the tender documents, significantly hindering a complete assessment. Submission deadline is provided, but the 'reveal date' is missing.

The tender is an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The technical requirements are detailed and objective, focusing on expertise rather than specific company capabilities. However, the absence of visible tender documents limits full access for potential bidders.

While an e-submission is implied by the deadline format, the 'Issues' section explicitly states 'No e-submission'. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not detailed. The submission deadline is provided, but a lack of direct access to documents and the potential lack of e-submission are practical drawbacks.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no reported disputes. The dates provided for submission and contract start are consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the research topic relates to environmental impacts, there are no specific sustainability criteria integrated into the procurement process itself. It is not stated to be EU funded.