Retour aux appels d'offres

Service d'hébergement accompagné avec loyers flexibles

Ouvert
Date limite
14 jours restants
Mars 18, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
013926-2026
Valeur
£287,601
Lieu
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, Royaume-Uni
Publié
Février 24, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 16, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 11, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 18, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Avril 19, 2026

Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
£287,601
Durée
12 mois
Lieu
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Autre
57
Score de qualité/100
Acceptable

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Prestation d'un service d'hébergement accompagné avec loyers flexibles

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

8 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (4)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (1)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit bids by the deadline: March 18, 2026, 00:00:00.
--Submit bids via the Oxford City Council's e-tendering portal.
--Provide a quality proposal that will be evaluated for 70% of the total score.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are mentioned in the provided summaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Demonstrate capability to provide a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial ratios) are mentioned in the provided summaries.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

4 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

OCDS RecordDOC
013926-2026_ocds_record.json

This document is an Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) record providing machine-readable metadata about the Oxford City Council's tender for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
013926-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the Oxford City Council's tender for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents, including buyer information and legal basis.

Official PDF VersionPDF
013926-2026_official.pdf

Oxford City Council seeks bids for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents, valued at £287,601, with submissions due by March 18, 2026, via their e-tendering portal, evaluated 70% on quality and 30% on price.

Tender NoticeHTM
013926-2026.html

This tender notice from Oxford City Council invites bids for a Supported Accommodation Service with Flexible Rents, detailing submission deadlines, an estimated contract value of £287,601, and award criteria of 70% quality and 30% price.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

57
Acceptable

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender exhibits moderate quality, providing clear basic information and supporting e-submission, but suffers from significant gaps in detailed requirements and internal data inconsistencies.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale65/100

The tender clearly defines the open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the AI-extracted summaries indicate a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement.

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in summaries
Missing specific eligibility requirements in summaries
Clarté55/100

The service description is clear, and the overall evaluation weighting (70% quality, 30% price) is stated in document summaries. However, the AI-extracted requirements are vague, lacking detailed technical, financial, and sub-criteria for the 'quality' component, hindering bidder understanding.

Vague technical capability requirements
Lack of detailed quality evaluation sub-criteria
Exhaustivité60/100

Basic information, value, duration, and location are provided, and documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender summaries are incomplete regarding specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial, and detailed technical requirements, which are crucial for a comprehensive bid.

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds in summaries
Missing specific eligibility requirements in summaries
Équité50/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and supports e-submission. However, the absence of detailed eligibility, financial, and specific quality sub-criteria for evaluation creates a significant risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining transparency and equal treatment for bidders.

Lack of detailed eligibility requirements
Lack of detailed financial requirements
Aspect pratique75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are specified. While the overall framework for submission is practical, the lack of detailed requirements may complicate the practical preparation of a comprehensive and competitive bid.

Lack of detailed requirements complicates bid preparation
Cohérence des données40/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are significant contradictions within the provided information, specifically regarding the presence of evaluation criteria and e-submission capabilities, which reduces overall data reliability.

Contradiction on evaluation criteria
Contradiction on e-submission
Durabilité30/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social criteria beyond the inherent nature of the service, or innovation focus, as indicated by automated checks.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Points forts

Clear service title and description
Basic tender information (value, duration, CPV, NUTS) is well-defined
Open procedure and e-submission portal specified
OCDS data provided, indicating transparency efforts

Préoccupations

Significant lack of detailed requirements (mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial, detailed technical)
Vague 'quality' evaluation criteria (70% weighting) without sub-criteria
Contradictions within the provided information regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission
Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria for the procurement process

Recommandations

1. Clearly articulate all mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, financial, and detailed technical requirements.
2. Provide comprehensive and objective sub-criteria for the 'quality' evaluation component.
3. Resolve internal contradictions within the tender information to enhance reliability.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline