Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Arbejdsmedicinske ydelser

Åben
Frist
149 dage tilbage
August 31, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
028213-2026
Værdi
£941,140
Lokation
London, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 26, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

August 24, 2026

Frist for tilbud

August 31, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

August 31, 2026

OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
£941,140
Varighed
36 måneder
Lokation
London
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

University of Greenwich søger at indkøbe arbejdsmedicinske ydelser (OHS) for både personale og studerende. Den/de succesfulde leverandør(er) vil blive påkrævet at levere en omkostningseffektiv ydelse, der maksimerer værdi for pengene gennem levering af en rettidig, effektiv, opdateret og kvalitetsydelse til både personale og studerende. Der er krav om tilstrækkelig fleksibilitet i tilgangen og leveringen af ydelsen for at imødekomme de organisatoriske strukturer, driftsstil, kultur og medarbejder-/studerendes roller. For mere information om denne mulighed, besøg venligst e-sourcing portalen på: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London:-Health-services./NCV69V6QP8 For at besvare denne mulighed, klik venligst her: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/NCV69V6QP8

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

10 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (6)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Respond to the opportunity via the eSourcing portal: https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/NCV69V6QP8
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Ability to deliver a cost-effective service.
--Ability to deliver a timely service.
--Ability to deliver an effective service.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Occupational Health Services is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on mandatory/eligibility requirements, impacting completeness and clarity.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. The submission deadline is provided, though its adequacy for the scope is not fully assessable without more context. No disputes are reported. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Klarhed80/100

The description of the required services is clear, emphasizing value for money, timeliness, effectiveness, and quality. The need for flexibility is also well-articulated. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Fuldstændighed70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are provided. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements, along with no content available for the tender documents, reduces the overall completeness.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
No specific eligibility requirements detailed
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is open and uses a competitive procedure, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the e-sourcing portal is provided for access and response, indicating a commitment to e-procurement. The criteria, while not fully detailed, are framed around objective service delivery aspects. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender directs bidders to an eSourcing portal for response, which is a practical approach. The contract start date is provided. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission' which contradicts the provided links, creating confusion. Financing information is not detailed.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (portal provided but noted as 'No e-submission' in issues)
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration and start date are logical. No suspensions or disputes are reported, contributing to high data consistency.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are areas for potential improvement in line with modern procurement practices.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear title, reference, and organization
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Use of e-sourcing portal for access and response
Competitive flexible procedure

Bekymringer

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements
No content available for tender documents
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Anbefalinger

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Include specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and contain sufficient information.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline