Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Program for finansielle forbedringer og bæredygtighedsassocierede

Åben
Frist
13 dage tilbage
April 17, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
026454-2026
Værdi
£55,000
Lokation
Inner London - West, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 27, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 23, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 10, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 17, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 01, 2026

Budget
£55,000
Varighed
11 måneder
Lokation
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

LGA vil engagere entreprenører udvalgt under denne brief for at støtte de kommuner, der er identificeret eller selvidentificeret som værende i behov af specialiststøtte. Disse kan omfatte, for eksempel, kommuner, der har identificeret særlige finansielle udfordringer eller risici, som de har brug for at håndtere eller overvinde, eller som måske mangler finansiel strategisk eller teknisk kapacitet. Der er behov for at arbejde sammen med disse kommuner for at designe strategisk finansiel rådgivning og støtte til disse kommuner og, i mange tilfælde, at yde denne støtte. Dette arbejde kræver specialistfinansiel erfaring og færdigheder, og troværdighed til at arbejde med senior interessenter inden for lokale myndigheder.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

8 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (1)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Contractors must possess specialist financial experience and skills.
--Contractors must have the credibility to work with senior stakeholders within local authorities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Ability to design strategic financial advice and support.
--Ability to provide specialist financial advice and support.
--Experience in supporting local councils with financial challenges, risks, or lack of financial strategic or technical capacity.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.

Log ind
75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for Finance Improvement & Sustainability Associates offers a generally clear framework with moderate completeness, focusing on specialist financial expertise for local government support. Key concerns include the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and potential for improved e-submission processes.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal compliance with a clear CPV code and proper procedure designation. Deadlines, while present, could be perceived as slightly short given the nature of the work. The absence of specified dispute history is positive. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Klarhed80/100

The description effectively outlines the need for specialist financial support for local authorities facing challenges. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are reasonably well-defined, focusing on experience and credibility. However, the lack of explicit submission and financial requirements could lead to ambiguity.

Fuldstændighed70/100

Essential information such as title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria and specific submission requirements impacts completeness. The limited availability of document content also detracts from the overall completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender promotes fairness by having an open competition type and disclosing the estimated value. The eligibility and technical requirements are based on objective skills and experience, avoiding overt company-specific tailoring. The primary concern for fairness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which can hinder transparency in the selection process.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and a clear document URL for downloading full documentation reduces its practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency. Dates provided appear logical within the context of the tender.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The sustainability aspect is partially addressed through the inclusion of 'Sustainability Associates' in the title, suggesting potential integration of green or social considerations. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, limiting its impact.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Styrker

Clear description of required expertise
Open competition procedure
Disclosure of estimated value
Provision of CPV code and NUTS code

Bekymringer

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Limited document content availability
Lack of explicit e-submission process
Potential for short submission deadline

Anbefalinger

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Provide direct links to full tender documentation and clarify the e-submission process.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline