Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.
Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.
Log indOpgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.
Log ind15 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier
Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser
Få AI-genererede resuméer af alle udbudsdokumenter. Forstå hurtigt, hvad hvert dokument indeholder, uden at læse hundredvis af sider — dækkende omfang, betingelser, evalueringskriterier og vigtige forpligtelser.
Log indThis tender for a minor works framework agreement presents a well-structured opportunity with clear financial breakdowns and a defined scope. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process beyond its restricted nature.
The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline for the estimated value. The procedure is identified as 'Competitive flexible procedure'. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a reveal date for submitted documents are notable omissions.
The description of services, including minor and major works, lot divisions, and contract types (NEC4), is generally clear. The financial breakdown per lot and per annum is well-defined. The conditions regarding the authority's non-obligation to award contracts are also explicitly stated.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and CPV code. The financial breakdown is detailed. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries limits the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.
The tender is classified as 'Restricted', implying a pre-selected list of bidders, which can limit broader competition. While the value is disclosed and criteria for major works (lowest price in mini-competitions) are mentioned, the absence of overall evaluation criteria for the framework agreement itself is a concern. The framework is divided into lots, which is a common and generally fair practice.
The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and the estimated value is provided. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission methods and the absence of financing details or specific URLs for documents hinder practicality for potential bidders.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided for the submission deadline and contract start are consistent, although the contract start date being the same as the submission deadline is unusual and may indicate an error or a placeholder. There are no reported disputes or suspensions.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.
Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser
Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter
Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.
Hej! Jeg er din AI-assistent for dette udbud. Jeg kan hjælpe dig med at forstå krav, frister, berettigelseskriterier og give strategiske indsigter.
Intet kreditkort krævet