Rengøringsservice - Gymnasiefællesskabet: Sct. Knuds Gymnasium

This tender for cleaning services at Sct. Knuds Gymnasium is generally well-structured, with clear descriptions and available documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure type (Open Procedure) and a specified CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline is very short. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

The description of the cleaning services, including the optional window cleaning and the approximate area, is clear. The AI-extracted requirements also provide a good overview of what is expected. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a description of services. The estimated value is not disclosed, and specific financial requirements are missing. While documents are available, their content is not detailed, and contract duration is not specified.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. E-procurement is indicated, which enhances accessibility. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and specific financial requirements could be a disadvantage for some bidders. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the submission deadline is extremely short (one day after publication), making practical submission challenging. Financing information and contract start date are not provided, hindering practical planning for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The AI-extracted requirements align with the tender description.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The sustainability score is moderate due to the absence of these specific criteria.