Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

ESCC - AW - SESLIP Godkendt Liste

Åben
Frist
254 dage tilbage
December 14, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Open Procedure
Reference
030907-2021
Værdi
£5,000,000
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex, Storbritannien
Udgivet
Marts 28, 2026
CPV-kode
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

December 13, 2021

Frist for spørgsmål

December 07, 2026

Frist for tilbud

December 14, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

December 13, 2021

Budget
£5,000,000
Varighed
61 måneder
Lokation
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
71
Kvalitetsscore/100
God

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

SESLIP opfordrer til og støtter den politiske og professionelle ledelse og styring af børnetjenester i lokale myndigheder for at demonstrere, udvikle og dele god praksis. Vores programmer understøtter udviklingen af børnetjenester som lærende organisationer, med fokus på: identifikation af centrale undersøgelsesområder, analyse og sammenligning af operationelle data om tjenesterne, brug af evidens til at informere beslutninger, herunder evidens tilgængelig uden for regionen, hvor relevant, brug af peer challenge og peer review, opbygning af ledelseskapacitet og -evner, udvikling af praksisstandarder gennem støttende indsats. Der er en Regional Forbedringsplan, der fastlægger aktiviteterne. Dens formål er at identificere måder, hvorpå lokale myndigheder i Sydøsten kan støtte hinanden til at forbedre sig og se på, hvordan kollektive handlinger kan hjælpe med at løse systemiske problemer i regionen. Denne godkendte liste er for de passende kvalificerede freelance konsulenter.

Risikoanalyse

Risikoanalyse er endnu ikke tilgængelig for dette lands udbud. Understøttede lande i øjeblikket: Estland, Polen, Litauen og Letland.

Vinderstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinderstrategi skræddersyet til dette udbud. Inkluderer sandsynlighedsscore for at vinde, vigtige muligheder og udfordringer, anbefalede fokusområder for tilbuddet, indsigt i konkurrencepositionering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for at maksimere dine chancer.

Log ind

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

17 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (9)
Finansiel (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-12-14 12:00:00.
--Applications must be for inclusion on an Approved List for freelance consultants.
--The submission must demonstrate how the bidder meets the criteria for a "suitably qualified freelance consultant" for SESLIP's objectives.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must be a suitably qualified freelance consultant.
--The bidder must possess qualifications relevant to supporting Children's Services leadership and management.
--The bidder must be able to operate as a freelance entity/individual.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Demonstrate expertise in supporting political and professional leadership and management of local authority Children’s Services.
--Possess capability in developing Children’s Services as learning organisations.
--Ability to identify key strands of enquiry relevant to Children's Services improvement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific insurance levels) are detailed in the provided tender information.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

1 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

Official PDF VersionPDF
030907-2021_official.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an Approved List of suitably qualified freelance consultants to support the South East Children's Services Improvement Partnership (SESLIP) in developing Children's Services.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

71
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for an Approved List of freelance consultants for Children's Services leadership support suffers from a critical lack of detailed documentation and explicit evaluation criteria, significantly hindering transparency and fair competition.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning100/100

The absence of detailed tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and explicit evaluation criteria raises significant concerns regarding compliance with public procurement principles of transparency, equal treatment, and proportionality. While an 'Approved List' procedure allows for flexibility, the fundamental lack of documentation is problematic for a tender of this estimated value.

Absence of detailed tender documents
Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds (beyond general statement)
Klarhed40/100

While the description of the service need is clear, the practical application of requirements for bidders is unclear due to the absence of supporting documents, detailed submission guidelines, and specific evaluation criteria. Bidders lack sufficient information on how their qualifications and capabilities will be objectively assessed.

Lack of detailed submission instructions
Ambiguity regarding how 'suitably qualified' and technical capabilities will be objectively assessed
Fuldstændighed83/100

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Key elements such as full tender documents, detailed instructions for bidders, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and, crucially, comprehensive evaluation criteria are missing. This makes it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission.

Missing full tender documents
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Retfærdighed80/100

The critical lack of detailed evaluation criteria and supporting tender documents creates a high risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. Without clear, predefined rules, it is difficult to ensure all bidders are judged on the same objective basis, raising concerns about potential for bias.

High risk of subjective evaluation due to missing criteria
Potential for unequal treatment without clear guidelines
Praktisk anvendelighed40/100

From a bidder's perspective, the tender is impractical due to the lack of essential information required to formulate a competitive and compliant bid. The contracting authority may also face significant challenges in objectively evaluating submissions without predefined criteria and a structured process, potentially leading to disputes or delays.

Bidders cannot adequately prepare without full documentation
Challenges for the contracting authority in conducting objective evaluation
Datakonsistens100/100

The provided data is internally consistent within its limited scope. However, the absence of full tender documents prevents a comprehensive assessment of data consistency across a complete tender package.

Bæredygtighed25/100

The tender description's focus on 'developing Children’s Services as learning organisations' and 'building leadership capacity' aligns with long-term service improvement. However, the tender lacks explicit green procurement or social criteria, which are increasingly important aspects of broader sustainability considerations in public procurement.

Absence of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of explicit social criteria

Styrker

Clear identification of the service need and objectives (Children's Services improvement)
Open procedure type encourages broad participation
Focus on 'Innovation Focus' and 'Approved List' allows for flexibility and access to specialized expertise
Reasonable contract duration (61 months) for an Approved List
Estimated value disclosed

Bekymringer

Critical absence of full tender documents and detailed evaluation criteria
High risk of subjective assessment due to vague requirements and missing evaluation methodology
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements creates uncertainty
Potential for reduced competition and legal challenges due to insufficient information for bidders
No explicit social or green procurement criteria, despite the nature of the service

Anbefalinger

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed instructions for bidders, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and clear, objective evaluation criteria with scoring mechanisms.
2. Provide explicit guidance on how 'suitably qualified' and technical capabilities will be assessed to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Consider incorporating relevant social and green procurement criteria where applicable to align with broader public policy objectives and enhance sustainability.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline