Skip to main content
Vil du afgive tilbud på offentlige udbud? Se vores TaaS-service til forberedelse af udbud
Udbud

Bevarelse af Põltsamaa Borgs cirkulære mur

Åben
Frist
5 dage tilbage
April 09, 2026
Kontrakt detaljer
Kategori
Byggeri
Reference
307769
Værdi
€40,000
Lokation
Estonia, Estland
Udgivet
Marts 19, 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Offer price100%
Projekttidslinje

Udbud offentliggjort

Marts 19, 2026

Frist for spørgsmål

April 02, 2026

Frist for tilbud

April 09, 2026

Åbning af udbud

April 09, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

Maj 14, 2026

VinderchancePRO
🔒
Opgrader til Professional
Se din estimerede vinderchance baseret på historiske data.
Opgrader til Professionel →
OrdregiverindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for ordregiverindsigt
Se forbrugsmønstre, foretrukne procedurer og mere.
Opgrader til Professionel →
SektorsindsigtPRO
🔒
Lås op for sektorsindsigt
Se gennemsnitlige vinderpriser, konkurrenceniveauer og markedstrends.
Opgrader til Professionel →
Budget
€40,000
Varighed
Ikke angivet
Lokation
Estonia
Type
Byggeri
75
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gns. Vindende Pris
€524,963
Gns. Tilbud
4.7
Konkurrence
Medium
SMV Vindere
94%
5,932 udbud analyseret

Original udbudsbeskrivelse

Bevarelse af dele af Põltsamaa Borgs cirkulære mur (bevarelse af fragmenter af det vestlige hjørne, den sydøstlige, sydvestlige mur og den nordøstlige mursektion).
Elektronisk Afsendelse

Kør risikoanalyse

Identificer potentielle risici, uoverensstemmelser og advarselstegn på tværs af alle udbudsdokumenter. Få en detaljeret risikorapport med alvorlighedsgrader og anbefalinger til afhjælpning.

Log ind

Vinderstrategi

AI-drevet analyse af dette udbuds krav, muligheder og udfordringer. Få strategiske indsigter for at maksimere din vinderchance.

60%
Estimeret vinderchanceModerat match

This tender for the conservation of Põltsamaa Castle's ring wall is a price-driven opportunity. Success hinges on submitting the absolute lowest compliant bid while demonstrating strong technical capability in historical conservation and ensuring visitor safety. Bidders must meticulously adhere to all submission requirements and leverage their experience to build trust.

Nøglebudskaber til at vinde

The most cost-effective and technically sound solution for preserving Põltsamaa Castle's heritage.

Ensuring the safety and continuity of visitor experience during critical conservation works.

Nøglemuligheder
Leverage established relationships or efficiencies in stone conservation to drive down costs.
Highlight specialized knowledge of heritage materials and conservation techniques to build confidence despite the price focus.
Demonstrate a proactive and robust visitor safety plan, which can be a subtle differentiator in a price-focused tender.
Nøgleudfordringer
Intense price competition due to 100% price evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures without compromising quality or safety, and aim for the absolute lowest viable price. Explore efficiencies in material sourcing and labor deployment.

Ensuring compliance with all technical and contractual requirements while offering a low price.

Meticulously review 'Tehniline kirjeldus.docx' and 'Vastavustingimused.pdf'. Develop a detailed work plan that integrates cost-efficiency with compliance. Conduct internal reviews to ensure all aspects are covered.

Potential for scope creep or unforeseen issues in heritage conservation impacting budget.

Build a small contingency into the price if feasible, or clearly define the scope of 'emergency situation liquidation' in the bid to manage expectations. Emphasize the thoroughness of the initial assessment in the bid.

Ideel tilbudsgiverprofil
A construction company with proven experience in historical building conservation, specifically stone structures. They must possess a strong understanding of heritage materials and techniques, a robust health and safety management system for public sites, and the financial capacity to undertake the project. Efficiency and cost control are paramount.
Nøglekrav
Price Offer (Pakkumuse mahutabel.xlsx)
Experience in conservation works of historical buildings/structures
Ability to ensure visitor safety during works
Adherence to Tehniline kirjeldus.docx
Adherence to Vastavustingimused.pdf
Hankepass (ESPD) submission
Nøgledifferentiatorer
Demonstrated track record of delivering similar heritage conservation projects on time and within budget.
Innovative (though not explicitly required) cost-saving approaches in heritage conservation that do not compromise integrity.
A highly detailed and practical visitor safety plan that exceeds minimum requirements.
Muligheder for social værdi
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to engage local labor or apprentices for specific tasks, framing it as a contribution to the local community's heritage preservation skills.
Fokusområder for tilbud
Offer price100.0%

Submit the absolute lowest compliant price. This requires meticulous cost breakdown, efficient resource allocation, and potentially leveraging economies of scale or specialized supplier relationships. Every euro saved directly translates to a higher score.

Anbefalinger6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Bid
KritiskHøj indsats

Given the 100% price evaluation, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible compliant bid. Conduct detailed costings, explore all efficiencies, and ensure the price is competitive enough to win.

Directly impacts the bid's score and win probability.
Master 'Tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Vastavustingimused'
KritiskHøj indsats

Thoroughly analyze and ensure full compliance with the technical specifications and contractual terms. Any deviation or omission can lead to disqualification, regardless of price.

Ensures bid compliance and avoids disqualification.
Demonstrate Proven Heritage Conservation Experience
KritiskMedium indsats

Clearly articulate and provide evidence of past experience in similar historical building/structure conservation works. Highlight specific skills in stone conservation and heritage materials.

Builds credibility and meets a key technical requirement.
Develop a Robust Visitor Safety Plan
KritiskMedium indsats

Detail a comprehensive plan for ensuring visitor safety during works, referencing the 'TEGEVUSKAVA' and 'Tehniline kirjeldus'. This demonstrates responsibility and operational capability.

Meets a critical technical requirement and builds confidence.
Meticulous Submission Process
HøjMedium indsats

Adhere strictly to all submission requirements, including the specified format for 'Pakkumuse mahutabel.xlsx' and the Hankepass. Double-check all deadlines and document uploads.

Prevents administrative disqualification.
Highlight Efficiency in Heritage Materials
MediumLav indsats

If possible, subtly highlight any cost-effective sourcing or application methods for heritage-approved materials, framing it as an efficient approach to preservation.

Can subtly reinforce the value proposition beyond just the lowest price.
Konkurrencemæssig positionering
Position as the most cost-effective provider of high-quality heritage conservation services, emphasizing efficiency and proven expertise in historical structures. Focus on delivering the required outcome at the lowest possible price point while assuring safety and compliance.

Konkurrenter

Opgrader for at se, hvilke virksomheder der sandsynligvis vil afgive tilbud på dette udbud, baseret på historiske indkøbsdata.

Log ind

Krav og kvalifikationer

22 krav på tværs af 5 kategorier

Indsendelse (13)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (2)
Teknisk (4)
Finansiel (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS13
--Submit a price offer using the provided form ('Pakkumuse mahutabel.xlsx').
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-09 07:00:00.
--Joint offers are permitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds may apply based on legal frameworks.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a legal entity capable of entering into contracts.
--Must not be subject to exclusion grounds.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Experience in conservation works of historical buildings/structures.
--Ability to execute restoration works according to the provided plan and technical specifications.
--Knowledge and application of appropriate conservation methods and materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to finance the project.
--Bidders must submit a price offer.

Forhåndsvisning af Krav

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

7 dokumenter tilgængelige med AI-resuméer

VastavustingimusedPDF
307769_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 4.3 KB

This document outlines compliance conditions regarding joint bids, subcontractor engagement rules, bid submission terms and format, and cost submission requirements for the Põltsamaa Castle ring wall conservation tender.

Vis
Pakkumuse esitamise vormXLS
Pakkumuse mahutabel.xlsx -- 10.6 KB

Bidders must submit a price offer for the conservation work of the Põltsamaa Castle ring wall by completing the provided form.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307769_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Vis
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307769_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 38.0 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as initial evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Vis
TEGEVUSKAVA RINGMÜÜRI VARISEMISE OHTLIKE PIIRKONDADE AVARIILISE OLUKORRA LIKVIDE...PDF
Restaureerimise tööde kava, Põltsamaa loss-li... -- 3.5 MB

The action plan for liquidating the emergency situation of the Põltsamaa Castle's curtain wall describes the object's condition, the purpose of the work, methodology, and materials to ensure visitor safety and preserve the heritage structure.

Vis
Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 4.2 MB

The technical specification defines the technical requirements, standards, and quality requirements for the conservation works of the Põltsamaa Castle ring wall, which construction companies must adhere to.

Vis
Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc -- 113.5 KB

The draft contract for the conservation of the Põltsamaa castle's ring wall outlines the contract terms and legal framework.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning af Dokumenter

Tilmeld dig for at se dokumentresuméer og analyser

75
God

Udbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for the conservation of Põltsamaa Castle's curtain wall is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on the lowest price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the accessibility of certain required documents.

Scoreopdeling

Overholdelse af lovgivning75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal frameworks for public procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The use of ESPD and Hankepass aligns with standard practices.

Klarhed80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are provided. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. However, the exact format and accessibility of the 'ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml' for AI analysis is unclear, and the 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc' are not summarized, leaving some conditions less transparent.

Lack of summary for 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc'.
Fuldstændighed70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml' is not fully analyzed, and the summaries for 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc' are missing, which could impact a bidder's full understanding of all requirements.

Incomplete AI analysis of 'ESPD_v2.0_laiendatud.xml'.
Missing summaries for 'Vastavustingimused.pdf' and 'Töövõtulepingu projekt.doc'.
Retfærdighed85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access (except for the AI-analyzed XML). The estimated value is disclosed, deadlines are reasonable, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. E-procurement is utilized, and joint offers are permitted, promoting broader participation.

Praktisk anvendelighed65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is implied through the tender platform. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the duration is presented as 'PERIOD' without a specific number of months for the contract itself, only for tender validity.

Lack of specific financing details.
Contract duration not explicitly stated in months/years.
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Bæredygtighed50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Styrker

Clear technical specifications and description of works.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement and Hankepass for initial proof.
Reasonable deadlines and logical date sequencing.

Bekymringer

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Incomplete AI analysis of ESPD XML and missing summaries for key documents.
Limited detail on financing and contract duration.

Anbefalinger

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., use of eco-friendly materials, waste management plans).
2. Provide full summaries for all essential documents and ensure all required file formats are fully analyzable.
3. Clarify financing sources and the exact contract duration.

Forhåndsvisning af AI-scoring

Tilmeld dig for at se komplette krav og analyser

Komplet analyse af kvalitetsscore
Detaljeret opdeling af underscores
Indsigter i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Intet kreditkort krævet • Opsætning på 2 minutter

Ny service

Vil du have os til at håndtere dette udbud?

Vores udbudseksperter forbereder alt. Det virker – du gennemgår, godkender og indsender.

~1hDin tid kun
80%+80%+
$0Forudbetaling
Se fuld sammenligning
Uden TaaSMed TaaS
40-80 timer
Forberedelsestid
~1 time
Din tid kun
15-25%
Gennemsnitlig vinderate
80%+
Vinderate
Risiko for fejl
Manuel gennemgang
Ekspert QA
Overholdelsestjek
Du gør alt
Håndter alt
Vi gør alt
End-to-end service
Lad os vinde dette udbud
Betal kun, når du vinder · 400+ virksomheder stoler på os
Eller gør det selv

Tilføj til pipeline