Basic digital skills training

This tender seeks basic digital skills training for unemployed individuals, emphasizing practical computer use. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating proven experience, a cost-effective curriculum aligned with DigComp, and highly qualified, relatable instructors. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, demonstrating a commitment to learner success will be a key differentiator.

Empowering Estonia's workforce through accessible and practical digital literacy training.

Delivering cost-effective, high-impact digital skills development aligned with international standards.

Leveraging experienced instructors to build confidence and independence in computer use for Töötukassa clients.

Develop a lean operational model for training delivery. Optimize instructor scheduling and resource allocation. Leverage existing, cost-effective training materials where appropriate, ensuring they meet DigComp standards.

Ensure all submitted documentation clearly proves teaching computer skills in formal education or group training between 01.01.2023 and the tender notice publication date. Quantify the number of individuals trained and the types of courses delivered.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis of all training delivery components. Identify opportunities for efficiency in instructor time, materials, and administrative overhead to ensure the lowest possible price per contact hour.

Design a curriculum that explicitly maps to DigComp levels and focuses on practical, everyday computer tasks. Clearly outline learning outcomes and the volume of contact learning, ensuring it is efficient and effective for the target audience.

For each proposed lecturer, emphasize not only their technical expertise but also their experience in teaching adult learners with limited digital skills and their ability to foster a supportive learning environment.

Carefully review all mandatory exclusion grounds and ensure that all submitted documentation unequivocally proves the bidder's eligibility and absence from any disqualifying circumstances.

Gather all required lecturer data, including qualifications, experience, and any specific consent forms required by the tender. Ensure this information is presented clearly and accurately.

Include a brief mention of how learners will be supported after the formal training concludes, such as access to online resources or a limited helpline. This adds value without significant cost.

This tender for basic digital skills training is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and specific social or innovation aspects.

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV classification and a clear, albeit short, submission deadline. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type (SE) suggests a standard open procedure, which is generally compliant.

The description of the training and its target audience is clear. The AI-extracted requirements are well-defined, and the purpose of each document is generally understandable. The evaluation criterion (lowest price per contact learning hour) is explicitly stated.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and organization details. However, the contract duration is not specified, which is a significant omission. The number of attached documents is indicated.

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price per contact learning hour). Requirements for eligibility and technical capability are clearly defined and seem to be applied universally, not tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied by the number of documents listed.

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. However, the contract start date is not provided, and financing information is absent. The duration of the contract is also missing, impacting practical planning for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically sequenced.

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive indicator. However, no specific social aspects or innovation focus are detailed in the provided information. It is also not indicated as EU funded.